Evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of geotechnical parameters by autocorrelation function and semivariogram function

被引:70
|
作者
Onyejekwe, Site [1 ]
Kang, Xin [2 ,3 ]
Ge, Louis [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Minist Works, Rd Sect Dev Team, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] Terrasense LLC, 45 Commerce Way, Totowa, NJ 07512 USA
[3] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Scale of fluctuation; Autocorrelation function; Semivariogram function;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.014
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The spatial variability of geotechnical parameters is determined in terms of their scale of fluctuation (SOF), theta. There are basically two approaches in analyzing the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters in order to determine their SOF. One uses an autocorrelation function (ACF) from random field theory and time series analysis and the other uses the semivariogram function (SVF) from geostatistics. Most of the published data on the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters were obtained using these methods, other methods include the local average theory and maximum likelihood method were also commonly adopted in the literature. The SOF, however, is not an inherent geotechnical property. Hence the SOF of a geotechnical parameter is dependent on factors such as geological setting, testing, and estimation methods among others. Since SOF is a non-inherent geotechnical property, it is expected that the SOF computed using different methods will give different values. Based on seven CPTu borings on predominantly soft clay in Hayti, Pemiscot County, Missouri, this paper presents an evaluation of the SOF estimated using both the ACF and the SVF with a view to determining the presence of any patterns to the difference and correlations between the two methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scale of Fluctuation for Geotechnical Probabilistic Analysis
    Nie, Xinyao
    Zhang, Jie
    Huang, Hongwei
    Liu, Zhongqiang
    Lacasse, Suzanne
    GEOTECHNICAL SAFETY AND RISK V, 2015, : 834 - 840
  • [2] Calculation of scale of fluctuation and variance reduction function
    Yan S.
    Guo L.
    Transactions of Tianjin University, 2015, 21 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [3] Calculation of Scale of Fluctuation and Variance Reduction Function
    闫澍旺
    郭林坪
    Transactions of Tianjin University, 2015, (01) : 41 - 49
  • [4] EVALUATION OF THE AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION FROM MEASUREMENT OF THE PHOTOCOUNT DISTRIBUTION
    CAGIGAL, MP
    PRIETO, P
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 1992, 25 (05) : 651 - 660
  • [5] Autocorrelation function of yarn unevenness
    Neckár, B
    Das, D
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF FIBRE & TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2005, 30 (04) : 421 - 430
  • [6] Roughness evaluation of turned composite surfaces by analysis of the shape of autocorrelation function
    Podulka, Przemyslaw
    Macek, Wojciech
    Zima, Beata
    Lesiuk, Grzegorz
    Branco, Ricardo
    Krolczyk, Grzegorz
    MEASUREMENT, 2023, 222
  • [7] Accuracy of Determining the Autocorrelation Function by the Polarity Correlation Function.
    Wolf, Dietrich
    1973, 27 (06): : 279 - 284
  • [8] Autocorrelation function for human gait analysis
    Derlatka, M.
    Kotowski, A.
    JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING, 2009, 11 (04) : 712 - 716
  • [9] Autocorrelation function of black body radiation
    Danek, A
    MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY 2003, 2003, 5445 : 156 - 159
  • [10] On the statistics of SuperDARN autocorrelation function estimates
    Reimer, A. S.
    Hussey, G. C.
    Dueck, S. R.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2016, 51 (06) : 690 - 703