Quality Improvement in End-of-Life Critical Care

被引:3
作者
Kahn, Jeremy M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15221 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15221 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
quality; intensive care unit; palliative care; health disparities; INTENSIVE-CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; DECISION-MAKING; MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES; FAMILY SATISFACTION; UNITED-STATES; ICU; PERFORMANCE; WITHDRAWAL; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1322401
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Patients, clinicians and policy makers are increasingly interested in measuring and improving the quality of health care at the end of life. The intensive care unit (ICU) is characterized by high mortality and frequent use of life-sustaining treatments, making critical care a natural target for these efforts. Indeed, multiple local and regional quality improvement efforts now specifically target the dying experience for ICU patients, patients at risk for ICU admission, and their families. These activities either target ICU caregivers through educational programs and quality incentives, or target patients and their families directly through palliative care and efforts to improve decisions around the end of life. Although these initiatives hold great promise, they also face inherent challenges it is difficult to measure the quality of end-of-life care, we lack practical targets for affecting quality, and uncertain political climates can often preclude serious discussions about end-of-life care. Moreover, these programs may lead to unintended consequences, potentially negatively impacting the very care they seek to improve. Future innovations surrounding how we measure the quality of end-of-life care and paradigm shifts in the way we think about ICU quality may help us to fully realize the goal of improving the dying process for ICU patients.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support [J].
Abbott, KH ;
Sago, JG ;
Breen, CM ;
Abernethy, AP ;
Tulsky, JA .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (01) :197-201
[2]   Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J].
Angus, DC ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Lidicker, J ;
Clermont, G ;
Carcillo, J ;
Pinsky, MR .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) :1303-1310
[3]   Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study [J].
Angus, DC ;
Barnato, AE ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Watson, RS ;
Rickert, T ;
Rubenfeld, GD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :638-643
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BUILDING SAFER HLTH
[5]   Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients - A study design that should be laid to rest [J].
Bach, PB ;
Schrag, D ;
Begg, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2765-2770
[6]   Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life [J].
Barnato, AE ;
McClellan, MB ;
Kagay, CR ;
Garber, AM .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 39 (02) :363-375
[7]   Development and Validation of Hospital "End-of-Life" Treatment Intensity Measures [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Farrell, Max H. ;
Chang, Chung-Chou H. ;
Lave, Judith R. ;
Roberts, Mark S. ;
Angus, Derek C. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (10) :1098-1105
[8]   Racial and Ethnic Differences in Preferences for End-of-Life Treatment [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Anthony, Denise L. ;
Skinner, Jonathan ;
Gallagher, Patricia M. ;
Fisher, Elliott S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (06) :695-701
[9]   The ethics of deactivating implanted cardioverter defibrillators [J].
Berger, JT .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (08) :631-634
[10]   Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU [J].
Campbell, ML ;
Guzman, JA .
CHEST, 2003, 123 (01) :266-271