Host DNA damage response facilitates African swine fever virus infection

被引:20
|
作者
Simoes, Margarida [1 ]
Martins, Carlos [1 ]
Ferreira, Fernando [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Fac Med Vet, CIISA, Dept Sanidade Anim, P-1300477 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Fac Med Vet, CIISA, Dept Morfol & Funcao, P-1300477 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
African swine fever virus; DNA damage response; Homologous recombination; Non-Homologous End-Joining; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Rad-3 related; RADIOSENSITIZING AGENT; ATR; REPLICATION; INHIBITION; PHOSPHORYLATION; DISRUPTION; ACTIVATION; CHROMATIN; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.007
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Studies with different viral infection models on virus interactions with the host cell nucleus have opened new perspectives on our understanding of the molecular basis of these interactions in African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection. The present study aims to characterize the host DNA damage response (DDR) occurring upon in vitro infection with the ASFV-Ba71V isolate. We evaluated protein levels during ASFV time-course infection, of several signalling cascade factors belonging to DDR pathways involved in double strand break repair - Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM), ATM-Rad 3 related (ATR) and DNA dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). DDR inhibitory trials using caffeine and wortmannin and ATR inducible-expression cell lines were used to confirm specific pathway activation during viral infection. Our results show that ASFV specifically elicits ATR-mediated pathway activation from the early phase of infection with increased levels of H2AX, RPA32, p53, ATR and Chk1 phosphorylated forms. Viral p72 synthesis was abrogated by AIR kinase inhibitors and also in ATR-kd cells. Furthermore, a reduction of viral progeny was identified in these cells when compared to the outcome of infection in ATR-wt. Overall, our results strongly suggest that the ATR pathway plays an essential role for successful ASFV infection of host cells. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE HOST RESPONSE TO AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS
    WARDLEY, RC
    NORLEY, SG
    MARTINS, CV
    LAWMAN, MJP
    PROGRESS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 1987, 34 : 180 - 192
  • [2] Regulation and Evasion of Host Immune Response by African Swine Fever Virus
    Wu, Lei
    Yang, Bincai
    Yuan, Xu
    Hong, Jinxuan
    Peng, Min
    Chen, Ji-Long
    Song, Zhongbao
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] African swine fever virus infection in the argasid host, Ornithodoros porcinus porcinus
    Kleiboeker, SB
    Burrage, TG
    Scoles, GA
    Fish, D
    Rock, DL
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 1998, 72 (03) : 1711 - 1724
  • [4] Host Innate and Adaptive Immunity Against African Swine Fever Virus Infection
    Zhang, Tianqi
    Lu, Zixun
    Liu, Jia
    Tao, Yang
    Si, Youhui
    Ye, Jing
    Cao, Shengbo
    Zhu, Bibo
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [5] African Swine Fever Virus Infection and Cytokine Response In Vivo: An Update
    Franzoni, Giulia
    Pedrera, Miriam
    Sanchez-Cordon, Pedro J.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2023, 15 (01):
  • [6] IMMUNE RESPONSE OF SWINE TO AFRICAN SWINE FEVER INFECTION
    PAN, IC
    DEBOER, CJ
    HEUSCHEL.WP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 156 (09) : 1238 - &
  • [7] DNA VIRUS CAUSES AFRICAN SWINE FEVER
    不详
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1969, 18 (05) : 10 - &
  • [8] Host cell targets for African swine fever virus
    Munoz-Moreno, Raquel
    Galindo, Inmaculada
    Angel Cuesta-Geijo, Miguel
    Barrado-Gil, Lucia
    Alonso, Covadonga
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2015, 209 : 118 - 127
  • [9] African swine fever virus evasion of host defences
    Dixon, L. K.
    Islam, M.
    Nash, R.
    Reis, A. L.
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2019, 266 : 25 - 33
  • [10] Evolution of African swine fever virus genes related to evasion of host immune response
    Fraczyk, Magdalena
    Wozniakowski, Grzegorz
    Kowalczyk, Andrzej
    Bocian, Lukasz
    Kozak, Edyta
    Niemczuk, Krzysztof
    Pejsak, Zygmunt
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 193 : 133 - 144