Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations

被引:12
作者
Sawaki, Risa [1 ]
Katayama, Jun'ichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600811, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Educ, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600811, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
top-down attentional mechanism; bottom-up attentional mechanism; selective attention; stimulus feature; task-irrelevant deviation; event-related brain potential; P3;
D O I
10.1167/8.15.4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
One highly controversial issue with respect to visual selective attention concerns the degree to which the top-down attentional mechanism modulates attentional allocation to bottom-up deviation. We investigated whether top-down directed attention to a stimulus feature modulates attentional allocation to task-irrelevant, bottom-up deviation. The P3 event-related potential was measured as an electrophysiological marker of attentional allocation. Target and non-target objects were serially presented in random order. Bottom-up deviations occurred as a change in task-irrelevant features of target or non-target objects, or as the appearance of task-irrelevant distractor objects around target or non-target objects. When task-irrelevant features were changed, the P3 deviant effect was greater in target than in non-target trials. In contrast, when distractor objects appeared, the P3 deviant effect was smaller in target than in non-target trials. These findings suggest that top-down directed attention to a stimulus feature modulates attentional allocation to bottom-up deviation such that attentional allocation is enhanced when bottom-up deviation and an attended feature share the same object but is inhibited when bottom-up deviation occurs outside an object with an attended feature. Thus, the top-down attentional mechanism has a strong influence even for deviant processing and provides a competitive advantage for objects with an attended feature.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   OVERRIDING STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE [J].
BACON, WF ;
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (05) :485-496
[2]   The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Zwaan, Laura ;
Theeuwes, Jan ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (05) :934-938
[3]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[4]   Temporal attentional capture: Effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search [J].
Dalton, Polly ;
Lavie, Nilli .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (05) :881-885
[5]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[7]   Competitive brain activity in visual attention [J].
Duncan, J ;
Humphreys, G ;
Ward, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (02) :255-261
[8]   Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course [J].
Egeth, HE ;
Yantis, S .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 48 :269-297
[9]   Can new objects override attentional control settings? [J].
Folk, CL ;
Remington, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (04) :727-739
[10]   Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture [J].
Folk, CL ;
Remington, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (03) :847-858