Publication Guidelines for Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project

被引:90
作者
Davidoff, Frank
Batalden, Paul
Stevens, David
Ogrinc, Greg
Mooney, Susan
机构
[1] Inst Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Ctr Leadership & Improvement, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In 2005, draft guidelines were published for reporting studies of quality improvement as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarizes the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also explains the development process, which included formulation of responses to informal feedback, written commentaries, and input from publication guideline developers; ongoing review of the literature on the epistemology of improvement and methods for evaluating complex social programs; and a meeting of stakeholders for critical review of the guidelines' content and wording, followed by commentary on sequential versions from an expert consultant group. Finally, the report discusses limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENH QUALITY TRANSP H
  • [3] Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care
    Baker, GR
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (03): : 150 - 151
  • [4] Teaching quality improvement - The devil is in the details
    Batalden, Paul
    Davidoff, Frank
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (09): : 1059 - 1061
  • [5] Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine
    Berwick, DM
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 14 (05): : 315 - 316
  • [6] The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration
    Bossuyt, PM
    Reitsma, JB
    Bruns, DE
    Gatsonis, CA
    Glasziou, PP
    Irwig, LM
    Moher, D
    Rennie, D
    de Vet, HCW
    Lijmer, JG
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [7] Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship
    Chin, MH
    T Chien, A
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (02): : 79 - 80
  • [8] Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
    Davidoff, F
    Batalden, P
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 14 (05): : 319 - 325
  • [9] DAY RA, 1989, J AM MED WRITERS ASS, V4, P16
  • [10] Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials
    Egger, M
    Jüni, P
    Bartlett, C
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15): : 1996 - 1999