LOW GRADE FUEL - OIL SHALE AND BIOMASS CO-COMBUSTION IN CFB BOILER

被引:23
作者
Konist, Alar [1 ]
Pihu, Tonu [1 ]
Neshumayev, Dmitri [1 ]
Kuelaots, Indrek [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Thermal Engn, EE-11712 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Brown Univ, Sch Engn, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
oil shale; biomass; co-combustion; TSP PM 10/2.5; ash composition; CO2 emission reduction; EMISSION REDUCTION; ASH BALANCE; FLUE-GAS; COMBUSTION; EFFICIENCY; COAL;
D O I
10.3176/oil.2013.2S.09
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Estonia has two of the world's largest oil shale firing circulating fluidized bed (CFB) units with a designed electrical capacity of 215 MW each. The units are based on double boiler CFB technology provided by Foster Wheeler Energia OY. The units are located at Eesti and Balti power plants (EPP and BPP). The paper presents analyses of data obtained from tests of oil shale and biomass co-combustion in the full-scale CFB boiler located at BPP. The tests were conducted at nominal boiler load: 100% (314 t/h), with a biomass thermal input of 15%. During the experiments ash samples from the furnace chamber (bottom ash), INTREX, super-/reheater (SH, RH), economizer (ECO), and air preheater (APH), and from all four fields of the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) were taken. Samples of fly ash for determining the mass division (total suspended particulates PM10 and PM2.5) were taken after the ESP. The gas analysis was performed at the ESP inlet. Analysis of the chemical composition of ash was carried out. The specific consumption of oil shale per useful heat and gross electricity were found and other techno-economic characteristics determined. It was found that oil shale and biomass co-combustion reduced CO2 emission by 14.6% and ash formation by 16% when compared with conventional oil shale CFB combustion. The SO2 emissions remained in the limits of 20-30 mg/Nm(3). Total suspended particulates PM10 and PM2.5 did not change compared to conventional oil shale CFB firing. The CFB boiler efficiency even increased slightly, when it is known that in case of coal and biomass co-combustion it decreases. Therefore, oil shale and biomass co-combustion can be considered as a viable option and near-term solution for reducing the environmental impact of oil shale-based power production.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Corrosivity of flue gases during co-firing Chinese biomass with coal at fluidised bed conditions [J].
Aho, M. ;
Envall, T. ;
Kauppinen, J. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 105 :82-88
[2]  
[Anonymous], 12952152003 EVSEN
[3]  
Arro H, 2005, OIL SHALE, V22, P399
[4]   Calculation of qualitative and quantitative composition of Estonian oil shale and its combustion products. Part 1. Calculation on the basis of heating value [J].
Arro, H ;
Prikk, A ;
Pihu, T .
FUEL, 2003, 82 (18) :2179-2195
[5]   Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants [J].
Basu, Prabir ;
Butler, James ;
Leon, Mathias A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :282-288
[6]   Development of a modeling approach to predict ash formation during co-firing of coal and biomass [J].
Doshi, V. ;
Vuthaluru, H. B. ;
Korbee, R. ;
Kiel, J. H. A. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (09) :1148-1156
[7]  
Hotta A, 2005, OIL SHALE, V22, P381
[8]   Interaction of fuels in co-firing in FBC [J].
Hupa, M .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (10) :1312-1319
[9]   OIL SHALE PULVERIZED FIRING: BOILER EFFICIENCY, ASH BALANCE AND FLUE GAS COMPOSITION [J].
Konist, Alar ;
Pihu, Tonu ;
Neshumayev, Dmitri ;
Siirde, Andres .
OIL SHALE, 2013, 30 (01) :6-18
[10]  
Luschen A., 2013, BIOMASS BIO IN PRESS