Decoding semantics across fMRI sessions with different stimulus modalities: a practical MVPA study

被引:24
作者
Akama, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Murphy, Brian [2 ,3 ]
Na, Li [1 ]
Shimizu, Yumiko [4 ]
Poesio, Massimo [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Grad Sch Decis Sci & Technol, Akama Lab, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Machine Learning Dept, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Trent, Ctr Mind Brain Sci, Rovereto, Italy
[4] Tokyo City Univ, Dept E&IS, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Univ Essex, Dept Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
fMRI; MVPA; GLM; machine learning; computational neurolinguistics; individual variability; embodiment; COGNITIVE STATES; BRAIN ACTIVITY; INFORMATION; VARIABILITY; LANGUAGE; CLASSIFICATION; ACTIVATION; REPRESENTATIONS; PATTERNS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fninf.2012.00024
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Both embodied and symbolic accounts of conceptual organzation would predict partial sharing and partial differentiation between the neural activations seen for concepts activated via different stimulus modalities. But cross-participant and cross-session variability in BOLD activity patterns makes analyses of such patterns with MVPA methods challenging. Here, we examine the effect of cross-modal and individual variation on the machine learning analysis of fMRI data recorded during a word property generation task. We present the same set of living and non-living concepts (land-mammals, or work tools) to a cohort of Japanese participants in two sessions: the first using auditory presentation of spoken words; the second using visual presentation of words written in Japanese characters. Classification accuracies confirmed that these semantic categories could be detected in single trials, with within-session predictive accuracies of 80-90%. However cross-session prediction (learning from auditory-task data to classify data from the written-word-task, or vice versa) suffered from a performance penalty, achieving 65-75% (still individually significant at p << 0.05). We carried out several follow-on analyses to investigate the reason for this shortfall, concluding that distributional differences in neither time nor space alone could account for it. Rather, combined spatio-temporal patterns of activity need to be identified for successful cross-session learning, and this suggests that feature selection strategies could be modified to take advantage of this.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses
    Aguirre, GK
    Zarahn, E
    D'Esposito, M
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (04) : 360 - 369
  • [2] Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task
    Aron, AR
    Gluck, MA
    Poldrack, RA
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (03) : 1000 - 1006
  • [3] Barsalou L. W., 1999, P 4 C INT COGN LING, V3, P209
  • [4] Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
  • [5] Situated simulation in the human conceptual system
    Barsalou, LW
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2003, 18 (5-6): : 513 - 562
  • [6] Bergen B.K., 2005, LITERAL NONLITERAL L, P255
  • [7] Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies
    Binder, Jeffrey R.
    Desai, Rutvik H.
    Graves, William W.
    Conant, Lisa L.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (12) : 2767 - 2796
  • [8] Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG
    Chan, Alexander M.
    Halgren, Eric
    Marinkovic, Ksenija
    Cash, Sydney S.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (04) : 3028 - 3039
  • [9] Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects
    Chao, LL
    Haxby, JV
    Martin, A
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (10) : 913 - 919
  • [10] Within- and cross-participant classifiers reveal different neural coding of information
    Clithero, John A.
    Smith, David V.
    Carter, R. McKell
    Huettel, Scott A.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 56 (02) : 699 - 708