Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

被引:483
作者
Reddy, Vivek Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Doshi, Shephal K. [2 ]
Sievert, Horst [4 ]
Buchbinder, Maurice [5 ]
Neuzil, Petr [3 ]
Huber, Kenneth [6 ]
Halperin, Jonathan L. [1 ]
Holmes, David [7 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] St Johns Hlth Ctr, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Homolka Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Cardiovasc Ctr Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Fdn Cardiovasc Med, La Jolla, CA USA
[6] St Lukes Hosp, Kansas City, MO USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; catheters; left atrial appendage; pericardial effusion; stroke prevention; warfarin; PREVENT STROKE; WARFARIN; THERAPY; EXPERIENCE; OCCLUSION;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results-Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2: 1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for approximate to 45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3 +/- 1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70). Conclusions-The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with primary hemostasis disorders and atrial fibrillation
    Dognin, Nicolas
    Salaun, Erwan
    Champagne, Catherine
    Domain, Guillaume
    O'Hara, Gilles
    Philippon, Francois
    Paradis, Jean-Michel
    Faroux, Laurent
    Beaudoin, Jonathan
    O'Connor, Kim
    Bernier, Mathieu
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Champagne, Jean
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (02) : 497 - 509
  • [22] Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Faustino, Ana
    Paiva, Luis
    Providencia, Rui
    Cacao, Romeu
    Costa, Marco
    Leitao-Marques, Antonio
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2013, 32 (04) : 311 - 323
  • [23] Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
    Price, Matthew J.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 60 (4-5) : 542 - 549
  • [24] Left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation
    Abramovitz Fouks, Avia
    Yaghi, Shadi
    Selim, Magdy H.
    Gokcal, Elif
    Das, Alvin S.
    Rotschild, Ofer
    Silverman, Scott B.
    Singhal, Aneesh B.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Greenberg, Steven M.
    Gurol, Mahmut Edip
    STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2024, : 120 - 128
  • [25] Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication for anticoagulation
    Grosset-Janin, D.
    Barth, E.
    Bertrand, B.
    Detante, O.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2015, 171 (05) : 426 - 432
  • [26] The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device for patients with atrial fibrillation: current status and future perspectives
    Wintgens, Lisette I. S.
    Maarse, Moniek
    Swaans, Martin J.
    Rensing, Benno J. W. M.
    Van Dijk, Vincent F.
    Boersma, Lucas V. A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (07) : 615 - 625
  • [27] Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
    Yu, Yunan
    Xu, Jing
    Wang, Liang
    Ye, Zi
    Chen, Zhisong
    Chen, Fadong
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [28] The Clinical Impact of Incomplete Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Watchman Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Viles-Gonzalez, Juan F.
    Kar, Saibal
    Douglas, Pamela
    Dukkipati, Srinivas
    Feldman, Ted
    Horton, Rodney
    Holmes, David
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (10) : 923 - 929
  • [29] Left atrial appendage closure in patients with intracranial haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation
    Fayos-Vidal, F.
    Arzamendi-Aizpurua, D.
    Millan-Alvarez, X.
    Guisado-Alonso, D.
    Camps-Renom, P.
    Prats-Sanchez, L.
    Martinez-Domeno, A.
    Delgado-Mederos, R.
    Marti-Fabregas, J.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2020, 35 (01): : 10 - 15
  • [30] Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Atrial Fibrillation
    Giudici, Michael C.
    Bhave, Prashant D.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2017, 35 (02) : 297 - +