Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

被引:483
|
作者
Reddy, Vivek Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Doshi, Shephal K. [2 ]
Sievert, Horst [4 ]
Buchbinder, Maurice [5 ]
Neuzil, Petr [3 ]
Huber, Kenneth [6 ]
Halperin, Jonathan L. [1 ]
Holmes, David [7 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] St Johns Hlth Ctr, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Homolka Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Cardiovasc Ctr Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Fdn Cardiovasc Med, La Jolla, CA USA
[6] St Lukes Hosp, Kansas City, MO USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; catheters; left atrial appendage; pericardial effusion; stroke prevention; warfarin; PREVENT STROKE; WARFARIN; THERAPY; EXPERIENCE; OCCLUSION;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results-Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2: 1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for approximate to 45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3 +/- 1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70). Conclusions-The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Results From the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) Clinical Trial and the Continued Access Registry
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    Holmes, David
    Doshi, Shephal K.
    Neuzil, Petr
    Kar, Saibal
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [2] The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
    Moebius-Winkler, Sven
    Sandri, Marcus
    Mangner, Norman
    Lurz, Phillip
    Daehnert, Ingo
    Schuler, Gerhard
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2012, (60):
  • [3] Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the LAmbre device in patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage thrombus
    Jin, Lu-Shen
    Ke, Jin-Yan
    Lin, Yuan-Nan
    Li, Ling
    Fu, Jia-Yang
    Chen, Yi-Lian
    Qiu, Yi-Xuan
    Li, Xiao-Wei
    Pan, Yang-Qi
    Li, Yue-Chun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [4] Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Swaans, M. J.
    Post, M. C.
    Rensing, B. J. W. M.
    Boersma, L. V. A.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 20 (04) : 161 - 166
  • [5] Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Bajwa, Rizma Jalees
    Kovell, Lara
    Resar, Jon R.
    Arbab-Zadeh, Armin
    Mandal, Kaushik
    Calkins, Hugh
    Berger, Ronald D.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (10) : 825 - 831
  • [6] Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With the WATCHMAN™ for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
    Price, Matthew J.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (02) : 142 - 151
  • [7] Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
    Fender, Erin A.
    Kiani, Jawad G.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2016, 18 (11)
  • [8] Safety of Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Sawaya, Fadi
    Abi-Saleh, Bernard
    Hoteit, Abbas
    Jdaidany, Jennifer
    Moumneh, Mohamad B.
    Harbieh, Bernard
    Khoury, Maurice
    Aramouni, Salim
    Abdulhai, Farah
    Refaat, Marwan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [9] Concomitant cryoballoon ablation and percutaneous closure of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Fassini, Gaetano
    Conti, Sergio
    Moltrasio, Massimo
    Maltagliati, Anna
    Tundo, Fabrizio
    Riva, Stefania
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Casella, Michela
    Majocchi, Benedetta
    Zucchetti, Martina
    Russo, Eleonora
    Marino, Vittoria
    Pepi, Mauro
    Tondo, Claudio
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (11): : 1705 - 1710
  • [10] Left Atrial Appendage Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
    Hussain, Sarah K.
    Malhotra, Rohit
    DiMarco, John P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04) : 458 - 464