Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies

被引:31
|
作者
Eriksen, Christian Ulrich [1 ]
Kyriakidis, Stavros [1 ]
Christensen, Line Due [2 ]
Jacobsen, Ramune [3 ]
Laursen, Jannie [4 ]
Christensen, Mikkel Bring [5 ]
Frolich, Anne [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Ctr Clin Res & Prevent, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Res Unit Gen Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Res Grp Social & Clin Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Falck, Global Business Qual Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Innovat & Res Ctr Multimorbid & Chron Condit, Slagelse, Region Zealand, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
qualitative research; clinical pharmacology; quality in health care; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; MULTIPLE MEDICATIONS; OLDER-PEOPLE; MEDICINES; RECONCILIATION; PREFERENCES; ADHERENCE; DISCHARGE; ATTITUDES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background We aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach. Results We included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking. Discussion Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dietary experiences after bariatric surgery in patients with obesity: A qualitative systematic review
    Li, Zhiwen
    Pan, Yingli
    Zhang, Yingchun
    Qin, Jingjing
    Lei, Xuejiao
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (06) : 2023 - 2034
  • [32] Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Medication-Related Harm Following Discharge from Hospital to Community Settings: A Systematic Review
    Alqenae, Fatema A.
    Steinke, Douglas
    Keers, Richard N.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 43 (06) : 517 - 537
  • [33] Patients' and nurses' experiences of delirium: a review of qualitative studies
    Belanger, Louise
    Ducharme, Francine
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 16 (06) : 303 - 315
  • [34] Perceived healthiness of foods: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Pinto, Vinicius Rodrigues Arruda
    Campos, Rafael Faria de Abreu
    Rocha, Felipe
    Emmendoerfer, Magnus Luiz
    Vidigal, Marcia Cristina Teixeira Ribeiro
    da Rocha, Samuel Jose Silva Soares
    Della Lucia, Suzana Maria
    Cabral, Laura Fernandes Melo
    de Carvalho, Antonio Fernandes
    Perrone, Italo Tuler
    FUTURE FOODS, 2021, 4
  • [35] Cancer survivors' experiences of using survivorship care plans: a systematic review of qualitative studies
    Keesing, Sharon
    McNamara, Beverley
    Rosenwax, Lorna
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2015, 9 (02) : 260 - 268
  • [36] Global prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication in older patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Mengnan
    Chen, Zhaoyan
    Xu, Ting
    Fan, Ping
    Tian, Fangyuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [37] Patients' experiences of patient-centred care in hospital setting: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Havana, Tiina
    Kuha, Suvi
    Laukka, Elina
    Kanste, Outi
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2023, 37 (04) : 1001 - 1015
  • [38] Patients' Perspectives and Experiences Living with Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies
    Nakayama, Ayano
    Tunnicliffe, David J.
    Thakkar, Vivek
    Singh-Grewal, Davinder
    O'Neill, Sean
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 43 (07) : 1363 - 1375
  • [39] Foot Self-Care Experiences Among Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
    Oni, David
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2020, 66 (04) : 16 - 25
  • [40] What are the implications for practice that arise from studies of medication taking? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Rashid, Mohammed Ahmed
    Llanwarne, Nadia
    Heyns, Natalie
    Walter, Fiona
    Mant, Jonathan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05):