Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies

被引:31
|
作者
Eriksen, Christian Ulrich [1 ]
Kyriakidis, Stavros [1 ]
Christensen, Line Due [2 ]
Jacobsen, Ramune [3 ]
Laursen, Jannie [4 ]
Christensen, Mikkel Bring [5 ]
Frolich, Anne [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Ctr Clin Res & Prevent, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Res Unit Gen Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Res Grp Social & Clin Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Falck, Global Business Qual Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Innovat & Res Ctr Multimorbid & Chron Condit, Slagelse, Region Zealand, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
qualitative research; clinical pharmacology; quality in health care; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; MULTIPLE MEDICATIONS; OLDER-PEOPLE; MEDICINES; RECONCILIATION; PREFERENCES; ADHERENCE; DISCHARGE; ATTITUDES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036158
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background We aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach. Results We included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking. Discussion Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Associations Between Chronic Disease, Polypharmacy, and Medication-Related Problems Among Medicare Beneficiaries
    Almodovar, Armando Silva
    Nahata, Milap C.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (05): : 573 - 577
  • [22] A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Experiences and Needs of Patients With Gliomas
    Li, Mengyuan
    Shi, Qian
    Yan, Ling
    Tian, Li
    Li, Haozheng
    Lu, Junshuai
    Xiao, Shuqing
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2020, 47 (05) : E120 - E130
  • [23] Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review
    Rezae, Fatima
    Kelly, Ayano
    Dey, Sagarika
    Moles, Rebekah
    Carter, Stephen
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [24] Patient experiences of sleep in dialysis: systematic review of qualitative studies
    Cheng, Elaine
    Evangelidis, Nicole
    Guha, Chandana
    Hanson, Camilla S.
    Unruh, Mark
    Wilkie, Martin
    Schell, Jane
    Hecking, Manfred
    Gonzalez, Andrea Matus
    Ju, Angela
    Eckert, Danny J.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2021, 80 : 66 - 76
  • [25] Adolescent Experiences in Wilderness Therapy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
    Kraft, Micah
    Cornelius-White, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF CREATIVITY IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 15 (03) : 343 - 352
  • [26] Experiences of empathy training in healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Winter, Rachel
    Leanage, Navin
    Roberts, Nia
    Norman, Robert, I
    Howick, Jeremy
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (10) : 3017 - 3037
  • [27] A qualitative study of nuisance bleeding and medication-related beliefs with dual antiplatelet drug therapy
    Kimble, Laura P.
    Momary, Kathryn M.
    Adewuyi, Modupe
    HEART & LUNG, 2018, 47 (05): : 485 - 488
  • [28] Medication-related hospital admissions and readmissions in older patients: an overview of literature
    Linkens, A. E. M. J. H.
    Milosevic, V.
    van der Kuy, P. H. M.
    Damen-Hendriks, V. H.
    Mestres Gonzalvo, C.
    Hurkens, K. P. G. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (05) : 1243 - 1251
  • [29] The prevalence of medication-related adverse events in inpatients-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laatikainen, Outi
    Miettunen, J.
    Sneck, S.
    Lehtiniemi, H.
    Tenhunen, O.
    Turpeinen, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 73 (12) : 1539 - 1549
  • [30] Changing Medication-Related Beliefs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sheils, Elizabeth
    Tillett, William
    James, Delyth
    Brown, Sarah
    Dack, Charlotte
    Family, Hannah
    Chapman, Sarah C. E.
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (03) : 155 - 170