Impact of atmospheric boundary layer inhomogeneity in CFD simulations of tall buildings

被引:17
作者
Abu-Zidan, Yousef [1 ]
Mendis, Priyan [1 ]
Gunawardena, Tharaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Civil engineering; Structural engineering; Computational fluid dynamics; Computer-aided engineering; Atmosphere modelling; Atmospheric boundary layer homogeneity; Tall building; CAARC; CFD simulation; Wind loading; Solution verification; K-EPSILON MODEL; CROSS-VENTILATION; TURBULENCE MODELS; RANS SIMULATION; FLOW; DISPERSION; CONFIGURATIONS; VALIDATION; FLUENT; ABL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04274
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been a growing interest in utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for wind analysis of tall buildings. A key factor that influences the accuracy of CFD simulations in urban environments is the homogeneity of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). This paper aims to investigate solution inaccuracies in CFD simulations of tall buildings that are due to ABL inhomogeneity. The investigation involves two steps. In the first step, homogenous and inhomogeneous ABL conditions are generated in an empty computational domain by employing two different modelling approaches. In the second step, the homogenous and inhomogeneous conditions are each applied to an isolated tall building, and simulation results are compared to investigate impact of ABL inhomogeneity on wind load predictions. The study finds that ABL inhomogeneity can be a significant source of error and may compromise reliability of wind load predictions. The largest magnitude of inhomogeneity error occurred for pressure predictions on the windward building surface. Shortening the upstream domain length reduced inhomogeneity errors but increased errors due to wind-blocking effects. The study proposes a practical approach for detecting ABL inhomogeneity that is based on monitoring sensitivity of key output metrics to variations in upstream domain length.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Steady RANS model of the homogeneous atmospheric boundary layer
    Cindori, Mihael
    Juretic, Franjo
    Kozmar, Hrvoje
    Dzijan, Ivo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2018, 173 : 289 - 301
  • [12] Dagnew A.K., 2009, P 11 AM C WIND ENG
  • [13] Franke J., 2007, Best Practice Guideline For the CFD Simulation of Flows in the Urban Environment
  • [14] Numerical studies on air flow around a cube
    Gao, Y
    Chow, WK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2005, 93 (02) : 115 - 135
  • [15] CFD modelling of small particle dispersion: The influence of the turbulence kinetic energy in the atmospheric boundary layer
    Gorle, C.
    van Beeck, J.
    Rarnbaud, P.
    Van Tendeloo, G.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (03) : 673 - 681
  • [16] On the use of the k-ε model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer
    Hargreaves, D. M.
    Wright, N. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2007, 95 (05) : 355 - 369
  • [17] Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD
    Huang, Shenghong
    Li, Q. S.
    Xu, Shengli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2007, 63 (05) : 612 - 627
  • [18] Computational modeling of the neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer flow using the standard k-ε turbulence model
    Juretic, Franjo
    Kozmar, Hrvoje
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2013, 115 : 112 - 120
  • [19] Full-scale flow measurement on a tall building with a continuous-wave Doppler Lidar anemometer
    Lim, Kiros E. W.
    Watkins, Simon
    Clothier, Reece
    Ladani, Raj
    Mohamed, Abdulghani
    Palmer, Jennifer L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2016, 154 : 69 - 75
  • [20] A new method to calculate wind profile parameters of the wind tunnel boundary layer
    Liu, GL
    Xuan, J
    Park, SU
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2003, 91 (09) : 1155 - 1162