Stability of food webs to biodiversity loss: Comparing the roles of biomass and node degree

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Huayong [1 ]
Zhao, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Wang [1 ]
Huang, Hai [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Res Ctr Ecol Engn & Nonlinear Sci, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus,Buckhurst Rd, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
关键词
Stability; Species loss; Node degree; Population biomass; Ecological network; Centrality indices; CASCADING EXTINCTIONS; SECONDARY EXTINCTIONS; INTERACTION STRENGTHS; NETWORK STRUCTURE; MARKOVIAN MODEL; TOP-DOWN; ROBUSTNESS; ECOSYSTEMS; COMMUNITIES; CONNECTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.045
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Population biomass, a key concept in traditional ecology, plays a vital role in assessing the consequences of biodiversity loss, in terms of community structure and ecosystem processes. Recent studies derived from network analysis assumed node degree, the number of trophic links of a focal node, as an indicator of node importance in maintaining stability, yet largely ignored the role of biomass. Here, we focus on this underappreciated concept and test if biomass can be used to identify node importance, and compare it with the more commonly applied indicator - node degree. The dynamical approaches were used to simulate secondary extinctions after sequential deletion of nodes in order of highest degree, biomass or random assignment. We showed that biomass-based deletions caused more collateral losses and thus led to lower stability than random removals in the dynamical analyses, i.e. biomass was an efficient indicator. However, the traditional indicator degree failed in identifying node importance. Our findings indicated the overstatement of the importance of node degree and emphasized the importance of population biomass in food webs, and supported a new view in analyzing the stability of food webs to species loss. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 729
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Weighted and unweighted network of amino acids within protein [J].
Aftabuddin, Md. ;
Kundu, Sudip .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2006, 369 (02) :895-904
[2]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) :378-382
[3]   Steady state of ecosystem flow networks: a comparison between balancing procedures [J].
Allesina, S ;
Bondavalli, C .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 165 (2-3) :221-229
[4]   RETROSPECTIVE MARKOVIAN MODEL FOR ECOSYSTEM RESOURCE FLOW [J].
BARBER, MC .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1978, 5 (02) :125-135
[5]   MARKOVIAN MODEL FOR ECOSYSTEM FLOW ANALYSIS [J].
BARBER, MC .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1978, 5 (03) :193-206
[6]   Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? [J].
Barnosky, Anthony D. ;
Matzke, Nicholas ;
Tomiya, Susumu ;
Wogan, Guinevere O. U. ;
Swartz, Brian ;
Quental, Tiago B. ;
Marshall, Charles ;
McGuire, Jenny L. ;
Lindsey, Emily L. ;
Maguire, Kaitlin C. ;
Mersey, Ben ;
Ferrer, Elizabeth A. .
NATURE, 2011, 471 (7336) :51-57
[7]   The architecture of complex weighted networks [J].
Barrat, A ;
Barthélemy, M ;
Pastor-Satorras, R ;
Vespignani, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (11) :3747-3752
[8]   Threshold extinction in food webs [J].
Bellingeri, Michele ;
Bodini, Antonio .
THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 6 (02) :143-152
[9]   Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities [J].
Berlow, EL ;
Neutel, AM ;
Cohen, JE ;
de Ruiter, PC ;
Ebenman, B ;
Emmerson, M ;
Fox, JW ;
Jansen, VAA ;
Jones, JI ;
Kokkoris, GD ;
Logofet, DO ;
McKane, AJ ;
Montoya, JM ;
Petchey, O .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (03) :585-598
[10]   Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs [J].
Berlow, Eric L. ;
Dunne, Jennifer A. ;
Martinez, Neo D. ;
Stark, Philip B. ;
Williams, Richard J. ;
Brose, Ulrich .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (01) :187-191