Asymmetric interactions between species of seaweed fly

被引:21
作者
Hodge, S [1 ]
Arthur, W [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SUNDERLAND,CTR ECOL,SUNDERLAND SR1 3SD,ENGLAND
关键词
amensalism; asymmetric; Coelopa; competition; contramensalism; facilitation; interactions; seaweed flies; Thoracochaeta; wrack beds;
D O I
10.2307/5925
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. This paper describes the colonization patterns of, and interactions between, three common species of British seaweed fly: the coelopids, Coelopa frigida and C. pilipes; and the sphaerocerid, Thoracochaeta zosterae. 2. All three species exhibited similar temporal patterns in abundance on wrack beds in the field: adult flies were more abundant in the first 4 days after wrack deposition and then again towards the end of the wrack bed cycle, coinciding with the emergence of the next generation. 3. Two forms of resource were presented to the flies, minced and chopped seaweed (Fucus serratus), under controlled environmental conditions. The species interacted so as to produce a dominance series, with C. frigida being the strongest species and T. zosterae the weakest. All pairwise interactions were extremely asymmetric, adding support to the growing awareness that this phenomenon is common in interactions between insects. 4. On chopped seaweed only, C. pilipes facilitated C. frigida, more than doubling the latter's emergent population size. This facilitation, in conjunction with the inhibition of C. pilipes by C. frigida, produced a contramensal (+, -) interaction. Suggestions are made as to how the facilitative effect may have been produced, but the exact mechanism is not yet understood.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 754
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Competition for nitrogen between the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera and the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa
    Alexandre, Ana
    Santos, Rui
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2020, 648 : 125 - 134
  • [22] Experiments on growth interactions between two invasive macrophyte species
    Barrat-Segretain, MH
    Elger, A
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [23] Effects of salinity on competitive interactions between two Juncus species
    Greenwood, M. E.
    MacFarlane, G. R.
    AQUATIC BOTANY, 2009, 90 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [24] Biotic Interactions between Two Species of Microalgae in Mixed Culture
    Mikheev M.A.
    Ipatova V.I.
    Spirkina N.E.
    Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, 2018, 73 (2) : 63 - 68
  • [25] Trophic interactions and the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem stability
    Thébault, E
    Loreau, M
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 166 (04) : E95 - E114
  • [26] Spatiotemporal pattern of interactions between an apex predator and sympatric species
    Prat-Guitart, Marta
    Onorato, David P.
    Hines, James E.
    Oli, Madan K.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2020, 101 (05) : 1279 - 1288
  • [27] Change in the distribution of a member of the strand line community:: the seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae)
    Edward, Dominic A.
    Blyth, Jennifer E.
    Mckee, Roderick
    Gilburn, Andre Simon
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2007, 32 (06) : 741 - 746
  • [28] Incorporating Context Dependency of Species Interactions in Species Distribution Models
    Lany, Nina K.
    Zarnetske, Phoebe L.
    Gouhier, Tarik C.
    Menge, Bruce A.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01) : 159 - 167
  • [29] Natural History and Ecology of Interactions Between Bordetella Species and Amoeba
    Ma, Longhuan
    Linz, Bodo
    Caulfield, Amanda D.
    Dewan, Kalyan K.
    Rivera, Israel
    Harvill, Eric T.
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [30] Asymmetric biotic interactions and abiotic niche differences revealed by a dynamic joint species distribution model
    Lany, Nina K.
    Zarnetske, Phoebe L.
    Schliep, Erin M.
    Schaeffer, Robert N.
    Orians, Colin M.
    Orwig, David A.
    Preisser, Evan L.
    ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (05) : 1018 - 1023