Ignition and Growth Modeling of Shock Initiation of Different Particle Size Formulations of PBXC03 Explosive

被引:15
作者
Hussain, Tariq [1 ]
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Huang, Fenglei [1 ]
Duan, Zhuoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, State Key Lab Explos Sci & Technol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ignition and growth modeling; shock sensitivity of PBXC03; grain size effect on ignition; shock ignition; Lee-Tarver model; growth of reaction;
D O I
10.1080/07370652.2014.995324
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The change in shock sensitivity of explosives having various explosive grain sizes is discussed. Along with other parameters, explosive grain size is one of the key parameters controlling the macroscopic behavior of shocked pressed explosives. Ignition and growth reactive flow modeling is performed for the shock initiation experiments carried out by using the in situ manganin piezoresistive pressure gauge technique to investigate the influences of the octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) particle size on the shock initiation and the subsequent detonation growth process for the three explosive formulations of pressed PBXC03 (87% HMX, 7% 1,3,5-trichloro-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB), 6% Viton by weight). All of the formulation studied had the same density but different explosive grain sizes. A set of ignition and growth parameters was obtained for all three formulations. Only the coefficient G(1) of the first growth term in the reaction rate equation was varied with the grain size; all other parameters were kept the same for all formulations. It was found that G(1) decreases almost linearly with HMX particle size for PBXC03. However, the equation of state (EOS) for solid explosive had to be adjusted to fit the experimental data. Both experimental and numerical simulation results show that the shock sensitivity of PBXC03 decreases with increasing HMX particle size for the sustained pressure pulses (around 4 GPa) as obtained in the experiment. This result is in accordance with the results reported elsewhere in literature. For future work, a better approach may be to find standard solid Gruneisen EOS and product Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) EOS for each formulation for the best fit to the experimental data.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, UCRLID116113 LAWR LI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS
[3]  
Duan ZP, 2010, INT J NONLIN SCI NUM, V11, P19, DOI 10.1515/IJNSNS.2010.11.S1.19
[4]   SHOCK HUGONIOT RELATION OF UNREACTED HETEROGENEOUS EXPLOSIVES [J].
Fu, Hua ;
Li, Tao ;
Tan, Duo-Wang ;
Zhao, Feng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2011, 25 (21) :2905-2913
[5]   Shock initiation experiments with ignition and growth modeling on low density HMX [J].
Garcia, Frank ;
Vandersall, Kevin S. ;
Tarver, Craig M. .
18TH APS-SCCM AND 24TH AIRAPT, PTS 1-19, 2014, 500
[6]  
Hua F. U., 2009, CHINESE J HIGH PRESS, V23, P427
[7]  
Kim K., 1987, P SHOCK WAV COND MAT, V531-534
[8]   PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL OF SHOCK INITIATION IN HETEROGENEOUS EXPLOSIVES [J].
LEE, EL ;
TARVER, CM .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1980, 23 (12) :2362-2372
[9]  
MARSH SP, 1980, LASL SHOCK HOGONIOT
[10]  
Menikoff R., 2012, LAUR1222838 LOS AL N