A mosaic genetic screen reveals distinct roles for trithorax and Polycomb group genes in drosophila eye development

被引:65
|
作者
Janody, F
Lee, JD
Jahren, N
Hazelett, DJ
Benlali, A
Miura, GI
Draskovic, I
Treisman, JE
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Skirball Inst Biomol Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Cell Biol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1534/genetics.166.1.187
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The wave of differentiation that traverses the Drosophila eye disc requires rapid transitions in gene expression that are controlled by a number of signaling molecules also required in other developmental processes. We have used a mosaic genetic screen to systematically identify autosomal genes required for the normal pattern of photoreceptor differentiation, independent of their requirements for viability. In addition to genes known to be important for eye development and to known and novel components of the Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic, Wingless, Epidermal growth factor receptor, and Notch signaling pathways, we identified several members of the Polycomb and trithorax classes of genes encoding general transcriptional regulators. Mutations in these genes disrupt the transitions between zones along the anterior-posterior axis of the eye disc that express different combinations of transcription factors. Different trithorax group genes have very different mutant phenotypes, indicating that target genes differ in their requirements for chromatin remodeling, histone modification, and coactivation factors.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polycomb and Trithorax Group Genes in Drosophila
    Kassis, Judith A.
    Kennison, James A.
    Tamkun, John W.
    GENETICS, 2017, 206 (04) : 1699 - 1725
  • [2] A genetic screen identifies novel polycomb group genes in Drosophila
    de Ayala Alonso, Andres Gaytan
    Gutierrez, Luis
    Fritsch, Cornelia
    Papp, Bernadett
    Beuchle, Dirk
    Mueller, Juerg
    GENETICS, 2007, 176 (04) : 2099 - 2108
  • [3] Genomic imprinting in Drosophila is maintained by the products of Suppressor of variegation and trithorax group, but not Polycomb group, genes
    Joanis, V
    Lloyd, VK
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2002, 268 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [4] Genomic imprinting in Drosophila is maintained by the products of Suppressor of variegation and trithorax group, but not Polycomb group, genes
    Joanis V.
    Lloyd V.
    Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2002, 268 (1) : 103 - 112
  • [5] A Genetic Mosaic Screen Reveals Ecdysone-Responsive Genes Regulating Drosophila Oogenesis
    Ables, Elizabeth T.
    Hwang, Grace H.
    Finger, Danielle S.
    Hinnant, Taylor D.
    Drummond-Barbosa, Daniela
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2016, 6 (08): : 2629 - 2642
  • [6] Regulation of cellular plasticity in Drosophila imaginal disc cells by the polycomb group, trithorax group and lama genes
    Klebes, A
    Sustar, A
    Kechris, K
    Li, H
    Schubiger, G
    Kornberg, TB
    DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 132 (16): : 3753 - 3765
  • [7] GENETIC INTERACTIONS AND DOSAGE EFFECTS OF POLYCOMB GROUP GENES OF DROSOPHILA
    CAMPBELL, RB
    SINCLAIR, DAR
    COULING, M
    BROCK, HW
    MOLECULAR & GENERAL GENETICS, 1995, 246 (03): : 291 - 300
  • [8] Genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila reveals Enok as a novel trithorax group regulator
    Umer, Zain
    Akhtar, Jawad
    Khan, Muhammad Haider Farooq
    Shaheen, Najma
    Haseeb, Muhammad Abdul
    Mazhar, Khalida
    Mithani, Aziz
    Anwar, Saima
    Tariq, Muhammad
    EPIGENETICS & CHROMATIN, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [9] Genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila reveals Enok as a novel trithorax group regulator
    Zain Umer
    Jawad Akhtar
    Muhammad Haider Farooq Khan
    Najma Shaheen
    Muhammad Abdul Haseeb
    Khalida Mazhar
    Aziz Mithani
    Saima Anwar
    Muhammad Tariq
    Epigenetics & Chromatin, 12
  • [10] Maintenance of the patterns of expression of homeotic genes in the development of Drosophila melanogaster by proteins of the polycomb, trithorax, and ETP groups
    Fedorova, E. V.
    Pindyurin, A. V.
    Baricheva, E. M.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2009, 45 (10) : 1145 - 1161