Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening

被引:42
|
作者
Senore, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Ederle, Andrea [3 ]
Benazzato, Luca [3 ]
Arrigoni, Arrigo [4 ]
Silvani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fantin, Alberto [3 ]
Fracchia, Mario [5 ]
Armaroli, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Segnan, Nereo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Prevenz Oncol Reg Piemonte, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, Turin, Italy
[3] Fracastoro Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Verona, Italy
[4] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, S Giovanni AS Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; PATIENT PREFERENCES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; POPULATION; TESTS; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To assess the population coverage and diagnostic yield of offering an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT) to non-responders to a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) invitation. Design A cohort study conducted in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. In this programme, eligible men and women aged 58 (Turin; 43 748 subjects) or 60 (Verona; 19 970 subjects) are invited, with a personal letter signed by their general practitioner, to undergo an FS. Bowel preparation is limited to a single enema self-administered at home. Subjects in whom one distal polyp >5 mm (>= 10 mm in Turin) or at least one adenoma (one advanced adenoma or more than two adenomas in Turin) is detected at FS are referred for colonoscopy. People who do not respond to the invitation to undergo an FS are invited to have an FIT (OC-Sensor; Eiken, Tokyo, Japan; single sample, cutoff 100 ng/ml). Attendance rate and neoplasia yield were analysed in four consecutive birth cohorts. Results Overall participation rate for the FS invitation was 39.3% in Verona and 29.9% in Turin. Of the eligible non-responders to the FS invitation, 19.3% (95% CI 18.9% to 19.7%) underwent an FIT. As a result, the proportion of people undergoing screening by FS or FIT was 55.2% in Verona and 39.3% in Turin, with no gender differences in either centre. FIT detected 8.3% of all advanced adenomas and 20.4% of all CRCs diagnosed at screening. Conclusions A strategy involving the sequential offer of FS and FIT is a feasible and efficient approach. FIT in people not attending for FS increases screening uptake and detection of advanced adenomas and CRCs.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 740
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis
    Yaron Niv
    Rachel Hazazi
    Zohar Levi
    Gerald Fraser
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008, 53
  • [42] Innovative approaches to colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people
    Redwood, Diana
    Provost, Ellen
    Perdue, David
    Haverkamp, Donald
    Espey, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2013, 72 : 340 - 341
  • [43] Colorectal cancer screening awareness of medical inpatients and in a cohort of Chinese people
    Luo, Derekjah-Yuen
    Huang, Judychien-Chun
    Sun, Tina
    Tan, Yu Mwee
    Selvaratnam, Sriharan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 116 - 116
  • [44] The importance of people's values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation
    Fritzell, Kaisa
    Nilsson, Kerstin Stake
    Jervaeus, Anna
    Hultcrantz, Rolf
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27 (06): : 1079 - 1084
  • [45] The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Colorectal Cancer Screening in Transgender People
    Shenoy, Shabari M.
    Karim, Gres
    Noack, Shanique W.
    Safer, Joshua
    Weisberg, Ilan
    Dinani, Amreen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S215 - S216
  • [46] Colorectal Cancer Screening by Double Contrast Barium Enema in Thai People
    Lohsiriwat, Varut
    Prapasrivorakul, Siriluck
    Suthikeeree, Wanwarang
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (04) : 1273 - 1276
  • [47] Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening
    Salkeld, G
    Solomon, M
    Short, L
    Ryan, M
    Ward, JE
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 27 (04) : 449 - 455
  • [48] Effect of evidence based Risk Information on informed choice in colorectal cancer Screening
    Steckelberg, A.
    Haastert, B.
    Huelfenhaus, C.
    Muehlhauser, I.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2015, 77 : S93 - S94
  • [49] Distribution of colorectal cancer in young African Americans: implications for the choice of screening test
    Hassab, Tarek H.
    Segev, Lior
    Kalady, Matthew F.
    Church, James M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (08) : 1477 - 1482
  • [50] SEQUENTIAL OR ACTIVE CHOICE FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING OUTREACH: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Induru, Vikranth R.
    Santos, David
    Reitz, Catherine
    McAuliffe, Timothy
    Orellana, Charles
    Volpp, Kevin
    Asch, David A.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S185 - S185