Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening

被引:42
|
作者
Senore, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Ederle, Andrea [3 ]
Benazzato, Luca [3 ]
Arrigoni, Arrigo [4 ]
Silvani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fantin, Alberto [3 ]
Fracchia, Mario [5 ]
Armaroli, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Segnan, Nereo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Prevenz Oncol Reg Piemonte, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, Turin, Italy
[3] Fracastoro Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Verona, Italy
[4] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, S Giovanni AS Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; PATIENT PREFERENCES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; POPULATION; TESTS; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To assess the population coverage and diagnostic yield of offering an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT) to non-responders to a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) invitation. Design A cohort study conducted in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. In this programme, eligible men and women aged 58 (Turin; 43 748 subjects) or 60 (Verona; 19 970 subjects) are invited, with a personal letter signed by their general practitioner, to undergo an FS. Bowel preparation is limited to a single enema self-administered at home. Subjects in whom one distal polyp >5 mm (>= 10 mm in Turin) or at least one adenoma (one advanced adenoma or more than two adenomas in Turin) is detected at FS are referred for colonoscopy. People who do not respond to the invitation to undergo an FS are invited to have an FIT (OC-Sensor; Eiken, Tokyo, Japan; single sample, cutoff 100 ng/ml). Attendance rate and neoplasia yield were analysed in four consecutive birth cohorts. Results Overall participation rate for the FS invitation was 39.3% in Verona and 29.9% in Turin. Of the eligible non-responders to the FS invitation, 19.3% (95% CI 18.9% to 19.7%) underwent an FIT. As a result, the proportion of people undergoing screening by FS or FIT was 55.2% in Verona and 39.3% in Turin, with no gender differences in either centre. FIT detected 8.3% of all advanced adenomas and 20.4% of all CRCs diagnosed at screening. Conclusions A strategy involving the sequential offer of FS and FIT is a feasible and efficient approach. FIT in people not attending for FS increases screening uptake and detection of advanced adenomas and CRCs.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 740
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR GENETIC SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Veldwijk, J.
    Lambooij, M. S.
    Bredenoord, A.
    van Kranen, H.
    Dekker, E.
    Kallenberg, F.
    Smit, H. A.
    de Wit, G. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A647 - A647
  • [32] Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among people with a family history of colorectal cancer: A scoping review
    Malik, Tun Firzara Abdul
    Beh, Hooi Chin
    Selvaraj, Christine Shamala
    Mallen, Christian David
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Lee, Yew Kong
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 189
  • [33] Impact of Expanding Screening Colonoscopy Interval on Providers Choice of Prescribing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Lahr, Rachel E.
    Handel, Daniel A.
    Gebke, Kevin B.
    Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (09) : 781 - 783
  • [34] The Effect of an Organized Screening Program on Racial and Ethnic Disparities and Choice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Ghai, Nirupa R.
    Quinn, Virginia P.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Schottinger, Joanne E.
    Lee, Alexander T.
    Zhao, Wei
    Zauber, Ann G.
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    Laiyemo, Adeyinka O.
    Goodman, Michael
    Fletcher, Robert H.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S168 - S169
  • [35] Up-to-date colorectal cancer screening as a determinant of participant's screening method of choice
    Sandoval, J. L.
    Rellecom, A.
    Theler, J. M.
    Arzel, B.
    Guessous, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 93 - 93
  • [36] Patient Race Influences Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate and Potentially Affects Choice of Screening Method
    Borum, Marie L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 101 (08) : 814 - 814
  • [37] IMPACT OF A PROGRAM OFFERING CT COLONOGRAPHY AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO COLONOSCOPY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN HEART TRANSPLANT EVALUATION
    Somlo, Diane R.
    Goiffon, Reece J.
    Richter, James
    Osho, Asishana A.
    Paneitz, Dane C.
    Magee, Cordula
    Gervais, Debra A.
    Kambadakone, Avinash
    Palchaudhuri, Sonali
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S262 - S263
  • [38] Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer
    Fallowfield, L
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1997, 30 (03) : 209 - 214
  • [39] Colorectal cancer screening by double contrast barium enema in Thai people
    Lohsiriwat, Varut
    Prapasrivorakul, Siriluck
    Suthikeeree, Wanwarang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 172 - 172
  • [40] Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis
    Niv, Yaron
    Hazazi, Rachel
    Levi, Zohar
    Fraser, Gerald
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (12) : 3049 - 3054