Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening

被引:42
|
作者
Senore, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Ederle, Andrea [3 ]
Benazzato, Luca [3 ]
Arrigoni, Arrigo [4 ]
Silvani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fantin, Alberto [3 ]
Fracchia, Mario [5 ]
Armaroli, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Segnan, Nereo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Prevenz Oncol Reg Piemonte, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, Turin, Italy
[3] Fracastoro Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Verona, Italy
[4] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, S Giovanni AS Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; PATIENT PREFERENCES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; POPULATION; TESTS; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To assess the population coverage and diagnostic yield of offering an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT) to non-responders to a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) invitation. Design A cohort study conducted in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. In this programme, eligible men and women aged 58 (Turin; 43 748 subjects) or 60 (Verona; 19 970 subjects) are invited, with a personal letter signed by their general practitioner, to undergo an FS. Bowel preparation is limited to a single enema self-administered at home. Subjects in whom one distal polyp >5 mm (>= 10 mm in Turin) or at least one adenoma (one advanced adenoma or more than two adenomas in Turin) is detected at FS are referred for colonoscopy. People who do not respond to the invitation to undergo an FS are invited to have an FIT (OC-Sensor; Eiken, Tokyo, Japan; single sample, cutoff 100 ng/ml). Attendance rate and neoplasia yield were analysed in four consecutive birth cohorts. Results Overall participation rate for the FS invitation was 39.3% in Verona and 29.9% in Turin. Of the eligible non-responders to the FS invitation, 19.3% (95% CI 18.9% to 19.7%) underwent an FIT. As a result, the proportion of people undergoing screening by FS or FIT was 55.2% in Verona and 39.3% in Turin, with no gender differences in either centre. FIT detected 8.3% of all advanced adenomas and 20.4% of all CRCs diagnosed at screening. Conclusions A strategy involving the sequential offer of FS and FIT is a feasible and efficient approach. FIT in people not attending for FS increases screening uptake and detection of advanced adenomas and CRCs.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 740
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OFFERING A BLOOD TEST INCREASES COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING UPTAKE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE DECLINED
    Liang, Peter S.
    Zaman, Anika
    Kaminsky, Anne M.
    Cui, Yongyan
    Castillo, Gabriel
    Tenner, Craig T.
    Sherman, Scott E.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S1178 - S1178
  • [22] Colorectal cancer screening offering colonoscopy and FIT vs. colonoscopy alone improved participation
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (07) : JC76 - JC76
  • [23] Offering male endoscopists as decoy option to nudge disinclined women to have colorectal cancer screening
    S. T. Stoffel
    R. S. Kerrison
    I. Vlaev
    C. von Wagner
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2020, 43 : 511 - 518
  • [24] Colorectal Cancer Screening in First Nations People Living in Manitoba
    Decker, Kathleen M.
    Demers, Alain A.
    Kliewer, Erich V.
    Musto, Grace
    Shu, Emma
    Biswanger, Natalie
    Elias, Brenda
    Griffith, Jane
    Turner, Donna
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (01) : 241 - 248
  • [25] Determinants of choice in offering drug holidays during first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Garattini, Silvio Ken
    Bonotto, Marta
    Porcu, Luca
    Ongaro, Elena
    Gerratana, Lorenzo
    Basile, Debora
    Parnofiello, Annamaria
    Pelizzari, Giacomo
    Cortiula, Francesco
    Corvaja, Carla
    Casagrande, Mariaelena
    Cardellino, Giovanni Gerardo
    Buonadonna, Angela
    Aprile, Giuseppe
    Puglisi, Fabio
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    Pella, Nicoletta
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 (32) : 2645 - 2660
  • [26] Review of the evidence for a colorectal cancer screening programme in elderly people
    Quarini, Catherine
    Gosney, Margot
    AGE AND AGEING, 2009, 38 (05) : 503 - 508
  • [27] Screening Practices of Unaffected People at Familial Risk of Colorectal Cancer
    Ouakrim, Driss Ait
    Boussioutas, Alex
    Lockett, Trevor
    Winship, Ingrid
    Giles, Graham G.
    Flander, Louisa B.
    Keogh, Louise
    Hopper, John L.
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (02) : 240 - 247
  • [28] Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among People With Mobility Disability
    Gofine, Miriam
    Mielenz, Thelma J.
    Vasan, Sowmya
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 52 (09) : 789 - 795
  • [29] Advocacy for colorectal cancer screening and awareness in people with intellectual disability
    Satge, Daniel
    Habib-Hadef, Sarah
    Otandault, Amaelle
    Samalin, Emmanuelle
    Tretarre, Brigitte
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (03) : 1650 - 1652
  • [30] Stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a discrete choice experiment
    Kromm, Seija K.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    McGregor, S. Elizabeth
    Currie, Gillian R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (04) : A80 - A80