Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening

被引:42
|
作者
Senore, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Ederle, Andrea [3 ]
Benazzato, Luca [3 ]
Arrigoni, Arrigo [4 ]
Silvani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Fantin, Alberto [3 ]
Fracchia, Mario [5 ]
Armaroli, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Segnan, Nereo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Prevenz Oncol Reg Piemonte, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, Turin, Italy
[3] Fracastoro Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Verona, Italy
[4] AOU S Giovanni Battista Torino, S Giovanni AS Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
[5] Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Turin, Italy
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; PATIENT PREFERENCES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; POPULATION; TESTS; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; PROGRAM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To assess the population coverage and diagnostic yield of offering an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT) to non-responders to a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) invitation. Design A cohort study conducted in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. In this programme, eligible men and women aged 58 (Turin; 43 748 subjects) or 60 (Verona; 19 970 subjects) are invited, with a personal letter signed by their general practitioner, to undergo an FS. Bowel preparation is limited to a single enema self-administered at home. Subjects in whom one distal polyp >5 mm (>= 10 mm in Turin) or at least one adenoma (one advanced adenoma or more than two adenomas in Turin) is detected at FS are referred for colonoscopy. People who do not respond to the invitation to undergo an FS are invited to have an FIT (OC-Sensor; Eiken, Tokyo, Japan; single sample, cutoff 100 ng/ml). Attendance rate and neoplasia yield were analysed in four consecutive birth cohorts. Results Overall participation rate for the FS invitation was 39.3% in Verona and 29.9% in Turin. Of the eligible non-responders to the FS invitation, 19.3% (95% CI 18.9% to 19.7%) underwent an FIT. As a result, the proportion of people undergoing screening by FS or FIT was 55.2% in Verona and 39.3% in Turin, with no gender differences in either centre. FIT detected 8.3% of all advanced adenomas and 20.4% of all CRCs diagnosed at screening. Conclusions A strategy involving the sequential offer of FS and FIT is a feasible and efficient approach. FIT in people not attending for FS increases screening uptake and detection of advanced adenomas and CRCs.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 740
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OFFERING PEOPLE A CHOICE FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. ATTENDANCE AND DETECTION RATE IN TORINO AND VERONA
    Senore, C.
    Armaroli, P.
    Bennazzato, L.
    Ederle, A.
    Fantin, A.
    Segnan, N.
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2010, 34 (5-6): : 65 - 65
  • [2] OFFERING PEOPLE A CHOICE FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. ATTENDANCE AND DETECTION RATE IN TORINO AND VERONA
    Benazzato, L.
    Ederle, A.
    Segnan, N.
    Senore, C.
    Fantin, A.
    Tomba, F.
    Inturri, P.
    Ntakirutinama, E.
    Patrizi, F.
    Bencivenni, S.
    Chioffi, C.
    Valsecchi, M.
    Caselin, C.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2010, 42 : S145 - S145
  • [3] Offering People a Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Attendance and Detection Rate in Turin and Verona
    Benazzato, Luca
    Senore, Carlo
    Segnan, Nereo
    Inturri, Paolo
    Patrizi, Franca
    Valsecchi, Massimo
    Chioffi, Maria C.
    Ntakirutinama, Ephrem
    Molaro, Mariella
    Bencivenni, Sofia
    Fantin, Alberto
    Ederle, Andrea
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S408 - S408
  • [4] Offering patients colorectal cancer screening
    Church, TR
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (05) : 328 - 329
  • [5] Screening for colorectal cancer: spoiled for choice?
    Sarfati, Diana
    Shaw, Caroline
    McLeod, Melissa
    Blakely, Tony
    Bissett, Ian
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (1440) : 120 - 128
  • [6] Participation in colorectal cancer screening strategies Offering a combination of faecal
    Baker, Holly
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 6 (02): : 91 - 91
  • [7] Offering patients a choice for colorectal cancer screening: a quality improvement pilot study in a quality circle of primary care physicians
    Martin, Yonas
    Braun, Leo Alexander
    Janggen, Marc-Andrea
    Tal, Kali
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Ducros, Cyril
    Selby, Kevin
    Auer, Reto
    Rohrbasser, Adrian
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [8] Offering disinclined people the choice between different screening appointments: a randomised online survey
    Stoffel, Sandro Tiziano
    Hirst, Yasemin
    Ghanouni, Alex
    Waller, Jo
    von Wagner, Christian
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2021, 36 (09) : 1135 - 1146
  • [9] Offering informed choice about breast screening
    Forbes, Lindsay J. L.
    Ramirez, Amanda-Jane
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2014, 21 (04) : 194 - 200
  • [10] Screening for people with a family history of colorectal cancer
    Dunlop, M
    Campbell, H
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7097): : 1779 - 1780