The quiet opposition: How the pro-economy lobby influences climate policy

被引:37
作者
Vesa, Juho [1 ]
Gronow, Antti [1 ]
Yla-Anttila, Tuomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2020年 / 63卷
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Advocacy strategies; Climate change; Denialism; Interest groups; Media; Policy networks; ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK; US; STRATEGIES; COVERAGE; NEWS; ORGANIZATIONS; CORPORATISM; JOURNALISM; PRESSURE; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102117
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The lack of ambitious climate change policies in large anglophone countries, such as the United States, has been explained by the strong media presence of denialist arguments against climate science. Such counterarguments are less visible in the news media of most European countries. Why do many of these countries nevertheless fail to enact ambitious climate change policies? This paper suggests that influential organizations may block ambitious climate change policies in corporatist countries without an extensive media strategy or a strong denialist message. We draw from theories on the policy process, policy networks, influence strategies, and comparative politics to formulate hypotheses about the existence, influence, and strategies of organizations that oppose ambitious climate policy. We test these hypotheses using an original combination of media data and survey data on the national climate policy network in Finland, a corporatist European country that has long lacked ambitious climate policies. The findings show that a coalition that prioritizes economic competitiveness over climate change mitigation is influential and occupies a central position in the policy network. This pro-economy lobby does not question the validity of climate science or actively seek media visibility. Rather, it influences the policy process using other strategies, such as inside lobbying, and appears in the news media less often than other climate policy organizations. Our results suggest that opponents of climate change mitigation can be powerful despite a weak media presence. This implies that studies on climate politics should pay more attention to strategies of influencing beyond the media spotlight.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Adams Gordon., 1981, IRON TRIANGLE POLITI
[2]   Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda [J].
Andrews, Kenneth T. ;
Caren, Neal .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 75 (06) :841-866
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CLIM CHANG PERF IND
[4]   Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change [J].
Antilla, L .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (04) :338-352
[5]   CLIMATE CHANGE CONTROVERSIES IN FRENCH MASS MEDIA 1990-2010 [J].
Aykut, Stefan Cihan ;
Comby, Jean-Baptiste ;
Guillemot, Helene .
JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2012, 13 (02) :157-174
[6]   2 FACES OF POWER [J].
BACHRACH, P ;
BARATZ, MS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1962, 56 (04) :947-952
[7]  
Barry E., 2019, NEW YORK TIMES 0412
[8]  
Baumgartner F, 2009, Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses and Why, DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226039466.001.0001]
[9]  
Baumgartner F. R., 2010, Agendas and Instability in American Politics
[10]   Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations [J].
Beyers, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (05) :585-612