Technology assessment in laparoscopic general surgery and gastrointestinal endoscopy: Science or convenience?

被引:9
作者
Bouchard, S
Barkun, AN
Barkun, JS
Joseph, L
机构
[1] MONTREAL GEN HOSP, DIV GASTROENTEROL, MONTREAL, PQ H3G 1A4, CANADA
[2] MONTREAL GEN HOSP, DIV GEN SURG, MONTREAL, PQ H3G 1A4, CANADA
[3] MONTREAL GEN HOSP, DIV CLIN EPIDEMIOL, MONTREAL, PQ H3G 1A4, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608903
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Gastrointestinal endoscopy and laparoscopic general surgery have been significantly affected by the emergence of new techniques. These two disciplines share many similarities, including the use of sophisticated and expensive technologies. Their proper assessment is essential because they are developed amidst ever-decreasing health cave budgets. Gastroenterologists and general surgeons must both participate in such evaluations and feel confident in interpreting pertinent published data. The present review uses a clinician's point of view with relevant examples to discuss the methodologies adopted in technology assessment and to highlight common pitfalls encountered in study design, patient selection, timing and selection of the study, blinding, and outcome measurement. Cost and statistical considerations, as well as ethical issues, are also reviewed in the context of technology assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 925
页数:11
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] American College of Physicians, 1990, ANN INTERN MED, V112, P641
  • [2] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ENDOSCOPIC ENDOPROSTHESIS VERSUS OPERATIVE BYPASS IN MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTIVE-JAUNDICE
    ANDERSEN, JR
    SORENSEN, SM
    KRUSE, A
    ROKKJAER, M
    MATZEN, P
    [J]. GUT, 1989, 30 (08) : 1132 - 1135
  • [3] REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS ARE MORE COST-EFFECTIVE THAN DISPOSABLE INSTRUMENTS FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    APELGREN, KN
    BLANK, ML
    SLOMSKI, CA
    HADJIS, NS
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (01): : 32 - 34
  • [4] WHY SOME HEALTH POLICIES DONT MAKE SENSE AT THE BEDSIDE
    ASCH, DA
    HERSHEY, JC
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (11) : 846 - 850
  • [5] ATTWOOD SEA, 1992, SURGERY, V112, P497
  • [6] USEFUL PREDICTORS OF BILE-DUCT STONES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    BARKUN, AN
    BARKUN, JS
    FRIED, GM
    GHITULESCU, G
    STEINMETZ, O
    PHAM, C
    MEAKINS, JL
    GORESKY, CA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [7] BARKUN AN, 1993, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V104, pA2
  • [8] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    BARKUN, JS
    WEXLER, MJ
    HINCHEY, EJ
    THIBEAULT, D
    MEAKINS, JL
    [J]. SURGERY, 1995, 118 (04) : 703 - 710
  • [9] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    BARKUN, JS
    BARKUN, AN
    SAMPALIS, JS
    FRIED, G
    TAYLOR, B
    WEXLER, MJ
    GORESKY, CA
    MEAKINS, JL
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828) : 1116 - 1119
  • [10] Barkun JS, 1991, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P313