A Taxonomy of Performance Shaping Factors for Human Reliability Analysis in Industrial Maintenance

被引:34
作者
Franciosi, Chiara [1 ]
Di Pasquale, Valentina [1 ]
Iannone, Raffaele [1 ]
Miranda, Salvatore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Ind Engn, Salerno, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-JIEM | 2019年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
maintenance; human error; human reliability analysis; performance shaping factors; influencing factors; HUMAN ERROR-PROBABILITY; AVIATION MAINTENANCE; RISK; QUANTIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; INSPECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.3926/jiem.2702
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose: Human factors play an inevitable role in maintenance activities, and the occurrence of Human Errors (HEs) affects system reliability and safety, equipment performance and economic results. The high HE rate increased researchers' attention towards Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) and HE assessment approaches. In these approaches, various environmental and individual factors influence the performance of maintenance operators affecting Human Error Probability (HEP) with a consequent variability in the success of intervention. However, a deep analysis of such factors in the maintenance field, often called Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs), is still missing. This has led the authors to systematically evaluate the literature on Human Error in Maintenance (HEM) and on the PSFs, in order to provide a shared PSF taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted to identify and select peer-reviewed papers that provided evidence on the relationship between maintenance activities and human performance. The obtained results provided a wide overview in the field of interest, shedding light on three main research areas of investigation: methodologies for human error analysis in maintenance, performance shaping factors and maintenance error consequences. In particular, papers belonging to the area of PSFs were analysed in-depth in order to identify and classify the PSFs, with the aim of achieving the PSF taxonomy for maintenance activities. The effects of each PSF on human reliability were defined and detailed. Findings: A total of 63 studies were selected and then analysed through a systematic methodology. 46% of these studies presented a qualitative/quantitative assessment of PSFs through application in different maintenance activities. Starting from the findings of the aforementioned papers, a PSF taxonomy specific for maintenance activities was proposed. This taxonomy represents an important contribution for researchers and practitioners towards the improvement of HRA methods and their applications in industrial maintenance. Originality/value: The analysis outlines the relevance of considering HEM because different error types occur during the maintenance process with non-negligible effects on the system. Despite a growing interest in HE assessment in maintenance, a deep analysis of PSFs in this field and a shared PSF taxonomy are missing. This paper fills the gap in the literature with the creation of a PSF taxonomy in industrial maintenance. The proposed taxonomy is a valuable contribution for growing the awareness of researchers and practitioners about factors influencing maintainers' performance.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 132
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance Measurement of Performance Shaping Factors using Dynamic Reliability Indices
    Sun, Z. Q.
    Gong, E. L.
    Liu, W.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 876 - 880
  • [32] Systematic Human Reliability Analysis (SHRA): A New Approach to Evaluate Human Error Probability (HEP) in a Nuclear Plant
    Di Bona, Gianpaolo
    Falcone, Domenico
    Forcina, Antonio
    Silvestri, Luca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2021, 6 (01) : 345 - 362
  • [33] A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis
    Alvarenga, M. A. B.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    Fonseca, R. A.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 25 - 41
  • [34] Integrated design environment for human performance and human reliability analysis
    Nelson, WR
    [J]. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES OF HUMAN FACTORS IN POWER GENERATION, 1997, : 87 - 811
  • [35] Reliability, risk and lifetime distributions as performance indicators for life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures
    Barone, Giorgio
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 123 : 21 - 37
  • [36] An Evidential Reasoning-Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process
    Wu, Bing
    Yan, Xinping
    Wang, Yang
    Soares, C. Guedes
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (10) : 1936 - 1957
  • [37] Human Reliability Analysis for Fishing Vessels in Korea Using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)
    Lee, Donghun
    Kim, Hyungju
    Koo, Kwiyeon
    Kwon, Sooyeon
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [38] An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering
    Catelani, Marcantonio
    Ciani, Lorenzo
    Guidi, Giulia
    Patrizi, Gabriele
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 215
  • [39] Considering performance shaping factors in situation-specific human error probabilities
    Park, KS
    Jung, KT
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 1996, 18 (04) : 325 - 331
  • [40] A reliability-centred maintenance strategy based on maintenance-free operating period philosophy and total lifetime operating cost analysis
    Long, J.
    Shenoi, R. A.
    Jiang, W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2009, 223 (G6) : 711 - 719