Public Attitudes About Genetic Testing in the Newborn Period

被引:25
作者
Etchegary, Holly [1 ]
Dicks, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hodgkinson, Kathleen [2 ]
Pullman, Daryl [3 ]
Green, Jane [3 ]
Parfey, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Hlth, Fac Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Med, Dept Genet, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
来源
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING | 2012年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
newborn screening; genetic testing; public opinion; attitude; expecting parent; PARENTAL ATTITUDES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01341.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To measure attitudes toward newborn genetic testing in our jurisdiction. Design: A cross-sectional, pen-and-paper survey. Setting: The survey was administered to the general public and prospective parents in Eastern Canada between April 2010 and December 2010. Participants: A total of 648 individuals completed surveys. Results: Positive attitudes were found toward newborn genetic testing, regardless of whether an effective treatment existed for the disorder in question or whether the disorder developed in adulthood. A majority agreed (69%) that testing should be available for any condition to assist with future reproductive decisions. Most respondents (93%) agreed parents should provide informed consent before newborn screening (NBS) was undertaken and that parents had a fundamental right to access NBS if they so choose. Conclusion: Interest in NBS for genetic disorders is generally high, regardless of whether an effective treatment exists. Findings lend support to the expansion of NBS panels to include those disorders currently lacking treatment but highlight consumers' desire for informed consent before testing is undertaken. JOGNN, 41, 191-200; 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01341.x
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 200
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions [J].
Etchegary, Holly ;
Potter, Beth ;
Howley, Heather ;
Cappelli, Mario ;
Coyle, Doug ;
Graham, Ian ;
Walker, Mark ;
Wilson, Brenda .
GENETIC TESTING, 2008, 12 (01) :115-124
[12]   Interest in Newborn Genetic Testing: A Survey of Prospective Parents and the General Public [J].
Etchegary, Holly ;
Dicks, Elizabeth ;
Green, Jane ;
Hodgkinson, Kathleen ;
Pullman, Daryl ;
Parfrey, Patrick .
GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2012, 16 (05) :353-358
[13]  
EVANS G, 1995, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V0004
[14]   The complexities of predictive genetic testing [J].
Evans, JP ;
Skrzynia, C ;
Burke, W .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7293) :1052-1056
[15]  
Group ACoMGNSE, 2006, PEDIATRICS S, V117, P296
[16]   Parental Attitudes toward Ethical and Social Issues Surrounding the Expansion of Newborn Screening Using New Technologies [J].
Hasegawa, L. E. ;
Fergus, K. A. ;
Ojeda, N. ;
Au, S. M. .
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2011, 14 (4-5) :298-306
[17]  
Holtzman NeilA., 1998, PROMOTING SAFE EFFEC
[18]  
Human Genetics Commission, 2001, PUBL ATT HUM GEN INF
[19]   Parents' Decision-Making in Newborn Screening: Opinions, Choices, and Information Needs [J].
Lipstein, Ellen A. ;
Nabi, Emara ;
Perrin, James M. ;
Luff, Donna ;
Browning, Marsha F. ;
Kuhlthau, Karen A. .
PEDIATRICS, 2010, 126 (04) :696-704
[20]   Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease [J].
Morren, Mattijn ;
Rijken, Mieke ;
Baanders, Arianne N. ;
Bensing, Jozien .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 65 (02) :197-204