Forensic assessment of a bridge downfall using Bayesian networks

被引:33
作者
Holicky, Milan [1 ]
Markova, Jana [1 ]
Sykora, Miroslav [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Klokner Inst, Prague 16608, Czech Republic
关键词
Bridge failures; Failure analysis; Forensic engineering; Probabilistic risk assessment; RISK; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.12.014
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Bayesian networks proved to be a useful tool in many technical fields as well as in forensic sciences. The present paper proposes a novel application of Bayesian networks in forensic engineering, focusing on the analysis of technical causes of a catastrophic bridge downfall. During repair a road bridge over important railway lines suddenly slipped down from temporary supports. Incidentally at the same time an intercity train approached the location and crashed into the collapsed bridge at a high speed. The accident resulted in great societal and economic consequences. Forensic investigation concerning causes of the bridge collapse was complicated due to the additional damage caused by the train. Moreover, the remaining structural elements of the collapsed bridge and temporary supports were shortly after the accident removed to renew railway traffic. Background materials of the investigation and additional detailed structural analyses did not reveal any convincing evidence of the initiation cause. Critical consideration of all possible causes including aerodynamic effects supplemented by a causal (Bayesian) network finally resulted in identification of the most significant causes including insufficient foundation and overall stiffness of temporary supports. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, EXPERTS UNCERTAINTY
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPUTER AIDED CIVIL
[3]   Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis [J].
Clemen, RT ;
Winkler, RL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (02) :187-203
[4]  
Decision Systems Laboratory - University of Pittsburgh, 2011, GENIE 2 0 SOFTW PACK
[5]   Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks [J].
Garbolino, P ;
Taroni, F .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 125 (2-3) :149-155
[6]   Fifteen years of expert judgement at TUDelft [J].
Goossens, L. H. J. ;
Cooke, R. M. ;
Hale, A. R. ;
Rodic-Wiersma, Lj. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (02) :234-244
[7]   Assessment of Flooding Risk to Cultural Heritage in Historic Sites [J].
Holicky, Milan ;
Sykora, Miroslav .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2010, 24 (05) :432-438
[8]   Probabilistic risk optimization of road tunnels [J].
Holicky, Milan .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (03) :260-266
[9]   Bayesian framework for managing preferences in decision-making [J].
Maes, MA ;
Faber, MH .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (05) :556-569
[10]  
Neapolitan R.E., 1990, Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms