Performance Evaluation of SDN and RPL in Wireless Sensor Networks

被引:0
作者
Tsapardakis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Ojo, Mike [2 ]
Chatzimisios, Periklis [1 ]
Giordano, Stefano [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexander TEI Thessaloniki ATEITHE, Dept Informat, Thessaloniki 57400, Greece
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Informat Engn, Via Caruso 16, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
来源
2018 GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND NETWORKING SYMPOSIUM (GIIS) | 2018年
关键词
Software Defined Networks; Internet of Things; Wireless Sensor Network; RPL; IPv6; Simulation; Hardware; Contiki; CC2538;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ensuring high quality of service and reliability are the key essential requirements in industrial type applications. Routing is an essential way in realizing these requirements as it determines the reliability, lifetime, end-to-end delay of a network. Software Defined Networking (SDN) delivers a promising solution to Wireless sensor networks (WSN) in providing flexibility in network management decisions such as routing, scheduling, just to mention a few. On the other hand, IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) is considered as the standardized routing protocol for industrial-type applications. Due to the rapid technological growth in WSN, which increases its challenges, a need to provide a detailed performance evaluation of SDN and RPL is consequential. In this paper, we investigate on the performance of SDN and RPL by providing a performance analysis on real-hardware based experimental measurements using OpenMote-CC2538. The results were compared with the simulated nodes in terms of reliability, packet loss and end-to-end delay.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Wireless sensor networks: a survey
    Akyildiz, IF
    Su, W
    Sankarasubramaniam, Y
    Cayirci, E
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2002, 38 (04) : 393 - 422
  • [2] Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey
    Al-Karaki, JN
    Kamal, AE
    [J]. IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 11 (06) : 6 - 28
  • [3] Alves R. C., 2017, 35 S BRAS RED COMP
  • [4] [Anonymous], P INT S PERF EV COMP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, P 3 WORKSH HOT TOP S, DOI DOI 10.1145/2620728.2620744
  • [6] Galluccio L, 2015, IEEE CONF COMPUT, P19, DOI 10.1109/INFCOMW.2015.7179322
  • [7] Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking
    Kim, Hyojoon
    Feamster, Nick
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2013, 51 (02) : 114 - 119
  • [8] Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey
    Kim, Hyung-Sin
    Ko, Jeonggil
    Culler, David E.
    Paek, Jeongyeup
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2017, 19 (04): : 2502 - 2525
  • [9] Kritsis K., 2018, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS
  • [10] Challenges in Designing an Automated System for Planning Spacecraft Activities
    Policella, Nicola
    Oliveira, Henrique
    Benzi, Edoardo
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACE MISSION CHALLENGES FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SMC-IT), 2014, : 1 - 8