Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: A recognition memory study

被引:56
作者
Aminoff, Elissa M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Clewett, David [2 ,3 ]
Freeman, Scott [2 ,3 ]
Frithsen, Amy [2 ,3 ]
Tipper, Christine [2 ,3 ]
Johnson, Arianne [2 ,3 ]
Grafton, Scott T. [2 ,3 ]
Miller, Michael B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Mellon Inst 115, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Collaborat Biotechnol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
Memory; Decision making; Individual differences; Recognition; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; SIGNAL-DETECTION; STRENGTH; DISTINCTIVENESS; NEUROBIOLOGY; PSYCHOTICISM; ACTIVATION; ITEM;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-012-0204-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An ability to flexibly shift a decision criterion can be advantageous. For example, a known change in the base rate of targets and distractors on a recognition memory test will lead optimal decision makers to shift their criterion accordingly. In the present study, 95 individuals participated in two recognition memory tests that included periodic changes in the base rate probability that the test stimulus had been presented during the study session. The results reveal a wide variability in the tendency to shift decision criterion in response to this probability information, with some appropriately shifting and others not shifting at all. However, participants were highly reliable in their tendency to shift criterion across tests. The goal of the present study was to explain what factors account for these individual differences. To accomplish this, over 50 variables were assessed for each individual (e.g., personality, cognitive style, state of mind). Using a regression model that incorporated different sets of factors, over 50 % of the variance was accounted for. The results of the analysis describe the total, direct, and mediating effects on criterion shifting from factors that include memory strength, strategy, and inherent characteristics such as a fun-seeking personality, a negative affect, and military rank. The results are discussed with respect to understanding why participants rarely chose an optimal decision-making strategy and provide greater insight into the underlying mechanisms of recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1030
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The PANASX: Manual for the positive and negative affect scheduleexpanded form
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P CVPR WORKSH FAC PR, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2004.315
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2 IEEE WORKSH APPL C
[5]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[6]   Signal Detection With Criterion Noise: Applications to Recognition Memory [J].
Benjamin, Aaron S. ;
Diaz, Michael ;
Wee, Serena .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (01) :84-115
[7]   Object-spatial imagery: New self-report imagery questionnaire [J].
Blajenkova, O ;
Kozhevnikov, M ;
Motes, MA .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) :239-263
[8]   Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder [J].
Brewin, CR ;
Rose, S ;
Andrews, B ;
Green, J ;
Tata, P ;
McEvedy, C ;
Turner, S ;
Foa, EB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 181 :158-162
[9]   Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory [J].
Bruno, Davide ;
Higham, Philip A. ;
Perfect, Timothy J. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2009, 37 (06) :807-818
[10]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131