Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in Management of Chronic Pain

被引:135
作者
Kumar, Krishna [1 ]
Rizvi, Syed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Regina Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Spinal Cord Stimulation; Chronic Pain; Conventional Medical Management; Cost<bold>-</bold>Effectiveness; Cost Comparison; REFRACTORY ANGINA-PECTORIS; SYNDROME TYPE-I; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UTILITY ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP; HEALTH; EQ-5D; SCS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1111/pme.12146
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and conventional medical management (CMM) compared with CMM alone for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and refractory angina pectoris (RAP). Design. Markov models were developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SCS vs CMM alone from the perspective of a Canadian provincial Ministry of Health. Each model followed costs and outcomes in 6-month cycles. Health effects were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were gathered from public sources and expressed in 2012 Canadian dollars (CAN$). Costs and effects were calculated over a 20-year time horizon and discounted at 3.5% annually, as suggested by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Cost-effectiveness was identified by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (50,000 Monte-Carlo iterations). Outcome measures were: cost, QALY, incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expected value of perfect information (EVPI), and strategy selection frequency. Results. The ICER for SCS was: CAN$ 9,293 (FBSS), CAN$ 11,216 (CRPS), CAN$ 9,319 (PAD), CAN$ 9,984 (RAP) per QALY gained, respectively. SCS provided the optimal economic path. The probability of SCS being cost-effective compared with CMM was 75-95% depending on pathology. SCS generates a positive INMB for treatment of pain syndromes. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that results were robust to plausible variations in model costs and effectiveness inputs. Per-patient EVPI was low, indicating that gathering additional information for model parameters would not significantly impact results. Conclusion. SCS with CMM is cost-effective compared with CMM alone in the management of FBSS, CRPS, PAD, and RAP.
引用
收藏
页码:1631 / 1649
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Complex regional pain syndrome: A review [J].
Albazaz, Rancem ;
Wong, Yew Toh ;
Homer-Vanniasinkam, Shervanthi .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 22 (02) :297-306
[2]   Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of non-reconstructable stable critical leg ischaemia: Results of the European peripheral vascular disease outcome study (SCS-EPOS) [J].
Amann, W ;
Berg, P ;
Gersbach, P ;
Gamain, J ;
Raphael, JH ;
Ubbink, DT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (03) :280-286
[3]   Does heart rate variability change in angina pectoris patients treated with spinal cord stimulation? [J].
Andersen, C .
CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (01) :14-18
[4]  
ANDERSON C, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V71, P419
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris -: Long-term results from the ESBY study [J].
Andréll, P ;
Ekre, O ;
Eliasson, T ;
Blomstrand, C ;
Börjesson, M ;
Nilsson, M ;
Mannheimer, C .
CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (01) :20-24
[6]   Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris-results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL) [J].
Andrell, P. ;
Yu, W. ;
Gersbach, P. ;
Gillberg, L. ;
Pehrsson, K. ;
Hardy, I. ;
Stahle, A. ;
Andersen, C. ;
Mannheimer, C. .
HEART, 2010, 96 (14) :1132-1136
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Decision modelling for health economic evaluation
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guide to the methods of technology appraisal
[9]   Optimal cost-effectiveness decisions: The role of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC), the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF), and the expected value of perfection information (EVPI) [J].
Barton, Garry R. ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (05) :886-897
[10]   What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year decision rule? [J].
Braithwaite, R. Scott ;
Meltzer, David O. ;
King, Joseph T., Jr. ;
Leslie, Douglas ;
Roberts, Mark S. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (04) :349-356