Developing an Action Plan for Patient Radiation Safety in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine Proceedings From the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Think Tank Held on February 28, 2011

被引:7
作者
Douglas, Pamela S.
Carr, J. Jeffery
Cerqueira, Manuel D.
Cummings, Jennifer E.
Gerber, Thomas C.
Mukherjee, Debabrata
Taylor, Allen J.
机构
关键词
AHA Scientific Statements; appropriate use; medical radiation; patient safety; quality improvement; CARDIAC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA; NORTH-AMERICAN-SOCIETY; IONIZING-RADIATION; NUCLEAR-CARDIOLOGY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; CANCER-RISKS; INTERVENTIONAL-RADIOLOGY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; IMAGING PROCEDURES;
D O I
10.1161/HCI.0b013e318252e9d9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Technological advances and increased utilization of medical testing and procedures have prompted greater attention to ensuring the patient safety of radiation use in the practice of adult cardiovascular medicine. In response, representatives from cardiovascular imaging societies, private payers, government and nongovernmental agencies, industry, medical physicists, and patient representatives met to develop goals and strategies toward this end; this report provides an overview of the discussions. This expert "think tank" reached consensus on several broad directions including: the need for broad collaboration across a large number of diverse stakeholders; clarification of the relationship between medical radiation and stochastic events; required education of ordering and providing physicians, and creation of a culture of safety; development of infrastructure to support robust dose assessment and longitudinal tracking; continued close attention to patient selection by balancing the benefit of cardiovascular testing and procedures against carefully minimized radiation exposures; collation, dissemination, and implementation of best practices; and robust education, not only across the healthcare community, but also to patients, the public, and media. Finally, because patient radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging is complex, any proposed actions need to be carefully vetted (and monitored) for possible unintended consequences. (Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:400-414.)
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 414
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amis E Stephen Jr, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.03.002
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Ann ICRP, V28, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, US FOOD DRUG ADM PUB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ANN ICRP, V37, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.11.001
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1977, ANN ICRP, V1, P228
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J NUCL MED, V52, P1162
[7]  
[Anonymous], AAPM POS STAT RAD RI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ANN ICRP, V31, P33
[9]   Comparison of Sequential and Helical Scanning for Radiation Dose and Image Quality: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study [J].
Bischoff, Bernhard ;
Hein, Franziska ;
Meyer, Tanja ;
Krebs, Markus ;
Hadamitzky, Martin ;
Martinoff, Stefan ;
Schoemig, Albert ;
Hausleiter, Joerg .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) :1495-1499
[10]   MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry-Standardization of Nomenclature [J].
Bolch, Wesley E. ;
Eckerman, Keith F. ;
Sgouros, George ;
Thomas, Stephen R. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (03) :477-484