Colony-Stimulating Factor Use and Impact on Febrile Neutropenia Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast, Colorectal, or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Were Receiving Chemotherapy

被引:12
作者
McCune, Jeannine S. [1 ,2 ]
Sullivan, Sean D. [2 ]
Blough, David K. [1 ,2 ]
Clarke, Lauren [3 ]
McDermott, Cara [1 ]
Malin, Jennifer [4 ]
Ramsey, Scott [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Res & Econ Assessment Canc & Healthcare REACH Grp, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Cornerstone Syst NW Inc, Lynden, WA USA
[4] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2012年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
cancer; supportive care; febrile neutropenia; colony-stimulating factor; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; FLUOROURACIL PLUS LEUCOVORIN; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; ADJUVANT TREATMENT; PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DOCETAXEL; TRIAL; CISPLATIN; GEMCITABINE;
D O I
10.1002/PHAR.1008
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To determine the impact of primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) use on febrile neutropenia in a large patient population receiving contemporary chemotherapy regimens to treat breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design. Retrospective claims analysis. Data Sources. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Puget Sound cancer registry and insurance claims records. Patients. A total of 2728 patients aged 25 years or older who received a diagnosis of breast cancer (998 patients), colorectal cancer (688 patients), or NSCLC (1042 patients) between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2005, and received chemotherapy. Measurements and Main Results. Initial chemotherapy regimen, CSF use (filgrastim or pegfilgrastim), and febrile neutropenia events were evaluated after the first chemotherapy administration. Subsequently, febrile neutropenia rates in patients receiving primary prophylactic CSF were compared with febrile neutropenia rates in patients receiving CSF in settings other than primary prophylaxis or not at all. The impact of primary prophylactic CSF could not be assessed for patients with colorectal cancer or NSCLC because only 1 and 18 febrile neutropenia events, respectively, occurred in those receiving primary prophylactic CSF. Of the 998 patients with breast cancer, 72 (7.2%) experienced febrile neutropenia, 28 of whom received primary prophylactic CSF. In the patients with breast cancer, we observed that primary prophylactic CSF use was associated with reduced febrile neutropenia rates; however, the analysis may have been confounded by unmeasured factors associated with febrile neutropenia. Conclusion. The impact of primary prophylactic CSFs on febrile neutropenia rates could not be demonstrated. Given the substantive cost of CSFs to pharmacy budgets, there are numerous opportunities for pharmacists to optimize CSF use. Research studies are needed to evaluate if guideline-directed prescribing of primary prophylactic CSFs can improve clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 19
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] History of chronic comorbidity and risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis
    Chao, Chun
    Rodriguez, Roberto
    Page, John H.
    Yang, Su-Jau
    Huynh, Julie
    Chia, Victoria M.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2015, 56 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [22] Suboptimal Duration of Granulocyte Colony stimulating Factor Use and Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
    Lin, Wan-Ting
    Wen, Yu-Wen
    Chien, Chun-Ru
    Gau, Churn-Shiouh
    Chiang, Shao C.
    Hsiao, Fei-Yuan
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (09) : 1287 - 1294
  • [23] Impact of an electronic tool in prescribing primary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for breast cancer patients receiving TC chemotherapy
    Jeffrey Sulpher
    Pierre Giguere
    Sean Hopkins
    Susan Dent
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3185 - 3189
  • [24] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) patterns of use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Mi Rim Choi
    Craig A. Solid
    Victoria M. Chia
    Anne H. Blaes
    John H. Page
    Richard Barron
    Thomas J. Arneson
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014, 22 : 1619 - 1628
  • [25] The impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy: a single-institution retrospective review
    Mousa, Luay
    Stephens, Julie A.
    Berger, Michael
    Ramaswamy, Bhuvaneswari
    Lustberg, Maryam
    Sardesai, Sagar
    Williams, Nicole
    VanDeusen, Jeffrey
    Stover, Daniel
    Cherian, Mathew
    Morgan, Evan
    Wesolowski, Robert
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (11) : 5537 - 5545
  • [26] Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
    K. Krzemieniecki
    P. Sevelda
    F. Erdkamp
    M. Smakal
    M. Schwenkglenks
    J. Puertas
    A. Trojan
    Z. Szabo
    K. Bendall
    J. Maenpaa
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014, 22 : 667 - 677
  • [27] The reliability of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) scores in predicting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor breakthrough febrile neutropenia among patients with lymphoma undergoing first-cycle chemotherapy: A prospective observational study
    Thungthong, Pravinwan
    Chamnanchanunt, Supat
    Suwanban, Tawatchai
    Nakhahes, Chajchawan
    Iam-Arunthai, Kunapa
    Akrawikrai, Tananchai
    Bunworasate, Udomsak
    Rojnuckarin, Ponlapat
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [28] Effect of Primary Prophylactic Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Use on Incidence of Neutropenia Hospitalizations for Elderly Early-stage Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
    Rajan, Suja S.
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Stearns, Sally C.
    Carpenter, William R.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (07) : 649 - 657
  • [29] Administration of docetaxel plus ramucirumab with primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study
    Kasahara, Norimitsu
    Sunaga, Noriaki
    Kuwako, Tomohito
    Naruse, Ichiro
    Imai, Hisao
    Jingu, Asuka
    Tsukagoshi, Yusuke
    Masuda, Tomomi
    Kitahara, Shinsuke
    Tsurumaki, Hiroaki
    Yatomi, Masakiyo
    Hara, Kenichiro
    Koga, Yasuhiko
    Sakurai, Reiko
    Mori, Keita
    Kaira, Kyoichi
    Maeno, Toshitaka
    Asao, Takayuki
    Hisada, Takeshi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (10) : 4825 - 4831
  • [30] Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia
    Gilles Freyer
    Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha
    Konstantinos Syrigos
    Mihai Marinca
    Giuseppe Tonini
    Say Liang Ng
    Zee Wan Wong
    Antonio Salar
    Guenther Steger
    Mahmoud Abdelsalam
    Lucy DeCosta
    Zsolt Szabo
    Medical Oncology, 2015, 32