Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis: Initial experience in a single institution

被引:5
作者
Gocmen, Ahmet [1 ]
Sanlikan, Fatih [1 ]
Ucar, Mustafa Gazi [1 ]
机构
[1] Umraniye Teaching & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2013年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
robotic tubal ligation reversal; tubal reanastomosis; ANASTOMOSIS; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.036
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess surgical outcomes for robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis in a single institution. Materials and Methods: Between March 2009 and January 2010, 10 patients underwent robot-assisted tubal ligation reversal (TLR) with a da Vinci S surgical system. Patient demographic data, including operative times, operative and postoperative complications, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy and pregnancy rates were recorded. Results: Mean age and body mass index for the patients were 37.7 (35-42) years and 28.9 (23.9-36.3) kg/m(2), respectively. The mean console time was 102.5 min and the mean total operation time was 130.6 (102-164) min. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 (1-2) days. There were no significant intra-operative or early-postoperative complications. All surgeries were completed robotically with no conversion to laparotomy. There were seven subsequent pregnancies in the study participants, representing a pregnancy rate of 70%, of which five were intrauterine pregnancies, one was an ectopic pregnancy, and one was an abortus. Conclusion: Robot-assisted TLR is safe and feasible. This procedure may facilitate minimally invasive treatment for patients who want to regain their fertility without the aid of artificial reproductive techniques. Copyright (C) 2013, Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Cadière GB, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P1467
[2]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study [J].
Caillet, Martin ;
Vandromme, Jean ;
Rozenberg, Serge ;
Paesmans, Marianne ;
Germay, Olivier ;
Degueldre, Michel .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (05) :1844-1847
[3]   Tubal sterilization trends in the United States [J].
Chan, Lolita M. ;
Westhoff, Carolyn L. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (01) :1-6
[4]  
Dawood M Y, 1999, Semin Laparosc Surg, V6, P58
[5]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a feasibility study [J].
Degueldre, M ;
Vandromme, J ;
Huong, PT ;
Cadière, GB .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (05) :1020-1023
[6]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study [J].
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM ;
Margossian, H ;
Stevens, L .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :1040-1042
[7]   Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance [J].
Goldberg, JM ;
Falcone, T .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (01) :145-147
[8]   Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness [J].
Patel, Sejal P. Dharia ;
Steinkampf, Michael P. ;
Whitten, Scott J. ;
Malizia, Beth A. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (04) :1175-1179
[9]   Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis [J].
Ribeiro, SC ;
Tormena, RA ;
Giribela, CG ;
Izzo, CR ;
Santos, NC ;
Pinotti, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 84 (02) :142-146
[10]   Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient Minilaparotomy [J].
Rodgers, Allison K. ;
Goldberg, Jeffley M. ;
Hammel, Jeffrey P. ;
Falcone, Tommaso .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (06) :1375-1380