Screening for colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia in kidney transplant recipients: cross sectional prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study of faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin and colonoscopy

被引:37
作者
Collins, Michael G. [1 ,2 ]
Teo, Edward [3 ]
Cole, Stephen R. [4 ,5 ]
Chan, Choy-Yoke [1 ]
McDonald, Stephen P. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Russ, Graeme R. [1 ,2 ]
Young, Graeme P. [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Bampton, Peter A. [5 ,7 ]
Coates, P. Toby [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Cent No Adelaide Renal & Transplantat Serv, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
[4] Repatriat Gen Hosp, Bowel Hlth Serv, Daw Pk, SA 5041, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Clin & Mol Med, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Sch Populat Hlth & Clin Practice, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[7] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2012年 / 345卷
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; HIGH-RISK GROUPS; GENERAL-POPULATION; SURVEILLANCE; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; AUSTRALIA; OUTCOMES; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.e4657
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether screening kidney transplant recipients aged over 50 years for colorectal cancer with a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin might be justified, by determining the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia and evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal haemoglobin testing compared with colonoscopy in a population of kidney transplant recipients at otherwise average risk. Design Cross sectional prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study with index test of faecal haemoglobin and reference standard of colonoscopy. Setting Outpatient clinics in metropolitan and regional hospitals in South Australia. Participants 229 kidney transplant recipients aged 50 years and over, who were at least 6 months (mean 9.0 (SD 8.4) years) post-transplant and otherwise at average risk of colorectal cancer, completed the study between June 2008 and October 2011. Interventions Faecal immunochemical testing (Enterix Insure) for human haemoglobin, followed by colonoscopy with histological evaluation of retrieved samples. Main outcome measures Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as an adenoma at least 10 mm in diameter, villous features, high grade dysplasia, or colorectal cancer; sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of faecal haemoglobin testing for advanced neoplasia compared with colonoscopy. Results Advanced colorectal neoplasia was found in 29 (13%, 95% confidence interval 9% to 18%) participants, including 2% (n=4) with high grade dysplasia and 2% (n=5) with colorectal cancer. Faecal testing for haemoglobin was positive in 12% (n=28); sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for advanced neoplasia were 31.0% (15.3% to 50.8%), 90.5% (85.6% to 94.2%), 32.1% (15.9% to 52.4%), and 90.1% (85.1% to 93.8%). Colonoscopy was well tolerated, with no significant adverse outcomes. To identify one case of advanced neoplasia, 8 (6 to 12) colonoscopies were needed. Conclusions Kidney transplant recipients aged over 50 years have a high prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Faecal haemoglobin screening for colorectal neoplasia has similar performance characteristics in transplant recipients to those reported in general population studies, with poor sensitivity but reasonable specificity. Surveillance colonoscopy might be a more appropriate approach in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CAN MED ASS J
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Cancer Fact Sheet #297
[3]  
Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, 2005, GUID PREV EARL DET M
[4]   De novo colorectal cancer: Five-year survival is markedly lower in transplant recipients compared with the general population [J].
Buell, JF ;
Papaconstantinou, HT ;
Skalow, B ;
Hanaway, MJ ;
Alloway, RR ;
Woodle, ES .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) :960-961
[5]   Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review [J].
Burch, J. A. ;
Soares-Weiser, K. ;
St John, D. J. B. ;
Duffy, S. ;
Smith, S. ;
Kleijnen, J. ;
Westwood, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2007, 14 (03) :132-137
[6]   Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002) [J].
Cairns, Stuart R. ;
Scholefield, John H. ;
Steele, Robert J. ;
Dunlop, Malcolm G. ;
Thomas, Huw J. W. ;
Evans, Gareth D. ;
Eaden, Jayne A. ;
Rutter, Matthew D. ;
Atkin, Wendy P. ;
Saunders, Brian P. ;
Lucassen, Anneke ;
Jenkins, Paul ;
Fairclough, Peter D. ;
Woodhouse, Christopher R. J. .
GUT, 2010, 59 (05) :666-689
[7]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Harris, Russell ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Roseanne M. ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Yawn, Barbara P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :627-+
[8]   A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Esterman, A ;
Cadd, B ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) :117-122
[9]  
Commonwealth of Australia, 2005, AUSTR BOW CANC SCREE
[10]   KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients [J].
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe ;
Kasiske, Bertram L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 :S1-S155