The Danish Flexicurity Labour Market During the Great Recession

被引:5
作者
Andersen, Torben M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[3] CEPR, London, England
[4] IZA, Bonn, Germany
来源
ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS | 2015年 / 163卷 / 04期
关键词
Flexicurity; Unemployment; Persistence;
D O I
10.1007/s10645-015-9260-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Can the Danish flexicurity model cope with a deep recession, or will long-term unemployment increase and the social safety net become overburdened? The Danish economy has experienced a boom-bust pattern ending with a large drop in GDP and thus labour demand. So far, the flexicurity model has coped with the Great Recession in the sense that gross flows in the labour market remain high, most unemployment spells are short, and there are no strong indications of increases in long-term unemployment. There are thus no signs that the large and prolonged aggregate demand shock is causing an increase in structural unemployment. Active labour market policies and fiscal space to accommodate the crisis are important in accounting for the performance of the model.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 490
页数:18
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Andersen T.M., 2015, IZA WORLD LABOR, V173, P1
[2]   Flexicurity- Labour market performance in denmark [J].
Andersen, Torben M. ;
Svarer, Michael .
CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2007, 53 (03) :389-429
[3]   Active labour market policies in a recession [J].
Andersen, Torben M. ;
Svarer, Michael .
IZA JOURNAL OF LABOR POLICY, 2012, 1
[4]   A Flexicurity Labour Market in the Great Recession: The Case of Denmark [J].
Andersen, Torben M. .
ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS, 2012, 160 (02) :117-140
[5]  
[Anonymous], 0335 MIT DEP EC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EMPL OUTL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014
[8]  
Arpia A., 2005, EC PAPERS, V238
[9]  
Cunat A., 2012, J EUROPEAN EC ASS, P225
[10]   Wage Dispersion and Decentralization of Wage Bargaining [J].
Dahl, Christian M. ;
le Maire, Daniel ;
Munch, Jakob R. .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (03) :501-533