Clinical Advantage of Attaining Index-Based Remission Prior to Composite Remission in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis

被引:0
作者
Yoshii, Ichiro [1 ]
Chijiwa, Tatsumi [2 ]
Sawada, Naoya [3 ]
机构
[1] Yoshii Hosp, Dept Rheumatol & Musculoskeletal Med, Shimanto City, Kochi, Japan
[2] Kochi Mem Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Kochi, Japan
[3] Dohgo Onsen Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
来源
REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA | 2022年 / 18卷 / 10期
关键词
Rheumatoid arthritis; Remission; ADL; Therapeutic index; PATIENT GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; RHEUMATOLOGY/EUROPEAN LEAGUE; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RECOMMENDATIONS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.reuma.2021.09.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: The clinical advantage of targeting index-based remission prior to Boolean remission was evaluated retrospectively. Materials and methods: A total of 578 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were treated for more than three years, were recruited. Patients who were treated to targeted index-based remission and composite measure remission criteria such as Boolean remission from the first consultation were divided according to the turn of attaining Boolean remission and index-based remission: G-IBR, a group that matched index-based remission at the same time Boolean remission is attained or earlier; G-BR IF, a group that attained Boolean remission followed by index-based remission or failed; G-IR BF, a group that could not attain Boolean remission despite attaining index-based remission; G-BothF, a group that failed to attain either Boolean remission or index-based remission. Background factors were statistically compared among groups. The Boolean remission rate in patients who attained index-based remission (BRR) and the rate of failure to attain index-based remission in patients who failed to attain Boolean remission (BFR) were statistically evaluated. Results: Groups comprising 225, 231, and 482 in G-IBR; 160, 154, and 8 in G-BR IF; 18, 18, and 75 in G-IR BF; and 175, 175, and 13 in G-BothF when indexing the clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and 28-joints disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), respectively. Disease activity indices' scores after Boolean remission were demonstrated to be significantly higher in the G-BR IF group than in the G-IBR group. BRR was 92.6%, 92.8%, and 86.5%, while BFR was 71.3%, 71.3%, and 13.8% when indexing CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP, respectively. Conclusions: Targeting CDAI and SDAI remission prior to Boolean remission contributes to a stable clinical course. (C) 2021 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatologia. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 579
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Aletaha D, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS100
[2]   Differences in disease activity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved DAS, SDAI, or CDAI remission but not Boolean remission [J].
Aletaha, Daniel ;
Wang, Xin ;
Zhong, Sheng ;
Florentinus, Stefan ;
Monastiriakos, Kelly ;
Smolen, Josef S. .
SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2020, 50 (02) :276-284
[3]   The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical Applications [J].
Bonnie Bruce ;
James F Fries .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
CARLSSON, AM .
PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) :87-101
[5]  
Felson DT, 2011, ANN RHEUM DIS, V70, P404, DOI [10.1136/ard.2011.149765, 10.1002/art.30129]
[6]   Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the disease activity score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria [J].
Fransen, J ;
Creemers, MCW ;
Van Riel, PLCM .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 43 (10) :1252-1255
[7]   Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) [J].
Herdman, M. ;
Gudex, C. ;
Lloyd, A. ;
Janssen, M. F. ;
Kind, P. ;
Parkin, D. ;
Bonsel, G. ;
Badia, X. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (10) :1727-1736
[8]   Comparative Assessment of the Different American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Remission Definitions for Rheumatoid Arthritis for Their Use as Clinical Trial End Points [J].
Mack, Michael E. ;
Hsia, Elizabeth ;
Aletaha, Daniel .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69 (03) :518-528
[9]   Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D [J].
Shiroiwa, Takeru ;
Fukuda, Takashi ;
Ikeda, Shunya ;
Igarashi, Ataru ;
Noto, Shinichi ;
Saito, Shinya ;
Shimozuma, Kojiro .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) :707-719
[10]   EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update [J].
Smolen, Josef S. ;
Landewe, Robert B. M. ;
Bijlsma, Johannes W. J. ;
Burmester, Gerd R. ;
Dougados, Maxime ;
Kerschbaumer, Andreas ;
McInnes, Iain B. ;
Sepriano, Alexandre ;
van Vollenhoven, Ronald F. ;
de Wit, Maarten ;
Aletaha, Daniel ;
Aringer, Martin ;
Askling, John ;
Balsa, Alejandro ;
Boers, Maarten ;
den Broeder, Alfons A. ;
Buch, Maya H. ;
Buttgereit, Frank ;
Caporali, Roberto ;
Cardiel, Mario Humberto ;
De Cock, Diederik ;
Codreanu, Catalin ;
Cutolo, Maurizio ;
Edwards, Christopher John ;
van Eijk-Hustings, Yvonne ;
Emery, Paul ;
Finckh, Axel ;
Gossec, Laure ;
Gottenberg, Jacques-Eric ;
Hetland, Merete Lund ;
Huizinga, Tom W. J. ;
Koloumas, Marios ;
Li, Zhanguo ;
Mariette, Xavier ;
Mueller-Ladner, Ulf ;
Mysler, Eduardo F. ;
da Silva, Jose A. P. ;
Poor, Gyula ;
Pope, Janet E. ;
Rubbert-Roth, Andrea ;
Ruyssen-Witrand, Adeline ;
Saag, Kenneth G. ;
Strangfeld, Anja ;
Takeuchi, Tsutomu ;
Voshaar, Marieke ;
Westhovens, Rene ;
van der Heijde, Desiree .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (06) :685-699