Levetiracetam vs. sulthiame in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes in childhood: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial (German HEAD Study)

被引:36
作者
Borggraefe, Ingo [1 ,5 ]
Bonfert, Michaela [1 ]
Bast, Thomas [2 ]
Neubauer, Bernd Axel [3 ]
Schotten, Klaus Juergen [4 ]
Massmann, Kai [1 ]
Noachtar, Soheyl [5 ]
Tuxhorn, Ingrid [6 ]
May, Theodor W. [7 ]
Heinen, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Pediat Neurol & Dev Med, D-80337 Munich, Germany
[2] Epilepsy Ctr Kork, Kehl, Germany
[3] Univ Giessen, Dept Neuropediat, D-35390 Giessen, Germany
[4] Univ Munich, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-80337 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Neurol, Epilepsy Ctr, D-80337 Munich, Germany
[6] Case Western Reserve Univ, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[7] Soc Epilepsy Res, Pharmacol Lab, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
BECTS; Levetiracetam; Sulthiame; OPEN-LABEL; CHILDREN; MONOTHERAPY; ADOLESCENTS; SEIZURES; BECTS; EEG;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.03.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To show non-inferiority of levetiracetam to sulthiame with respect to efficacy, tolerability and safety in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes in a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Methods: A sample size of 60 subjects (treatment group) was calculated to show reliable statistical results for non-inferiority. A total of 44 patients could be randomly allocated to either (LEV or STM) treatment group. Explorative data analysis was performed to investigate differences in the number of treatment failure events (occurrence of a seizure during the observation period of 6 months) and total dropouts. In addition, information of the occurrence of adverse events was collected. Results: 43 patients were analyzed. One patient had to be excluded due to protocol violation. Treatment failure events occurred in four patients (19.0%) in the LEV treatment group and in two patients (9.1%) in the STM treatment group, respectively, (p = 0.412). The number of dropouts due to adverse reactions was five in the LEV treatment group and one in STM treatment group (23.8% vs. 4.5%, respectively, p = 0.095). Severe adverse events occurred in patients treated with LEV (n = 2, 9.5%). The total number of dropouts due to either seizure recurrence or adverse events was significantly higher in the LEV group (n = 9, 42.9%) compared to the STM group (n = 3, 13.6%, p = 0.03). Interpretation: The study results concerning non-inferiority were not conclusive, as the calculated sample size was not reached to support sufficient statistical power due to limited recruitment in a 26 months period. The rates of seizure free patients were [relatively] high in both groups. However, the results indicate that termination of drug treatment due to seizure recurrence or adverse events occurred more frequently in the LEV group compared to STM. Behavioral disturbances were the most common adverse event causing study termination. (C) 2013 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 514
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Arzimanoglou A, 2007, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V9, P351
  • [2] Bali B, 2007, EPILEPSIA, V48, P2266
  • [3] The influence of sulthiame on EEG in children with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)
    Bast, T
    Völp, T
    Wolf, C
    Rating, D
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 (02) : 215 - 220
  • [4] Levetiracetam for benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes - three cases
    Bello-Espinosa, LE
    Roberts, SL
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2003, 12 (03): : 157 - 159
  • [5] Sulthiame in childhood epilepsy
    Ben-Zeev, B
    Watemberg, N
    Lerman, P
    Barash, I
    Brand, N
    Lerman-Sagie, T
    [J]. PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 46 (05) : 521 - 524
  • [6] Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009
    Berg, Anne T.
    Berkovic, Samuel F.
    Brodie, Martin J.
    Buchhalter, Jeffrey
    Cross, J. Helen
    Boas, Walter van Emde
    Engel, Jerome
    French, Jacqueline
    Glauser, Tracy A.
    Mathern, Gary W.
    Moshe, Solomon L.
    Nordli, Douglas
    Plouin, Perrine
    Scheffer, Ingrid E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2010, 51 (04) : 676 - 685
  • [7] The course of benign partial epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes: A meta-analysis
    Bouma, PAD
    Bovenkerk, AC
    Westendorp, RGJ
    Brouwer, OF
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (02) : 430 - 437
  • [8] Clinical trials in children
    Caldwell, PHY
    Murphy, SB
    Butow, PN
    Craig, JC
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9436) : 803 - 811
  • [9] Levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine as monotherapy in newly diagnosed benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS): An open-label, parallel group trial
    Coppola, Giangennaro
    Franzoni, Emilio
    Verrotti, Alberto
    Garone, Caterina
    Sarajlija, Jasenka
    Operto, Francesca Felicia
    Pascotto, Antonio
    [J]. BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 29 (05) : 281 - 284
  • [10] Benign partial epilepsy of childhood: a longitudinal neuropsychological and EEG study off cognitive function
    Deonna, T
    Zesiger, P
    Davidoff, V
    Maeder, M
    Mayor, C
    Roulet, E
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2000, 42 (09) : 595 - 603