Valuation of externalities of selected waste management alternatives: A comparative review and analysis

被引:57
作者
Eshet, T [1 ]
Ayalon, O
Shechter, M
机构
[1] Technion, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Nat Resource & Environm Res Ctr, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
关键词
waste management; externalities; landfill; incinerator; valuation; disamenities;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accessible and transparent data on the social costs of externalities is crucial to waste management researchers, decision-makers, and managers, if waste management strategies are to be successfully analyzed and implemented. The primary objective of this study, which is based on a thorough review of existing literature and research, was to assist the abovementioned in their decision-making with reliable recent data, by mapping, gathering, analyzing, and comparing different valuation results of external costs associated with various types of pollution and disamenities related to landfilling and incineration of solid waste. The second objective was to assess the suitability and reliability of various valuation methods and techniques that were implemented in the reviewed valuation studies, as well as the transferability of valuations across sites. The paper focuses on studies conducted since 1990, because in dynamic fields such as the waste sector, externalities, and valuation, it is essential to stay current with the most recent information and valuations. We discuss the issues and the limits of the valuation techniques and analyze the estimates of all the studies, presenting the results in the form of intervals and averages of damage costs. In spite of the inconsistencies evident in the variability in the results we reviewed, the outcome of this first comprehensive critical analysis is significant and the valuations obtained in this study provide estimates of orders of magnitude of external costs that can be used by decision makers in the waste sector to address important policy questions associated with social welfare. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 364
页数:30
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]  
*AEA TECHN, 2002, COMM PUTS PRIC AIR P
[3]  
APSIMON H, 1997, ACID RAIN EUROPE COU
[4]  
AYALON O, 1993, MARKET ENV EFFECTIVE
[5]  
BELOFF BR, 2000, ENV QUAL MANAGE WIN
[6]  
BRISSON I, 1995, 9506 CSERGE WM
[7]  
BROOME A, 2000, BEY BIN EC RECYCLING
[8]  
Brown K.A., 2000, EC EVALUATION PVC WA
[9]  
Burtraw D., 1997, 9801REV RES FUT
[10]  
*CAMBR EC EFTEC WR, 2003, STUD EST DIS COSTS L