Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with revision total hip arthroplasty

被引:19
|
作者
Amenabar, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, Wael A. [3 ]
Avhad, Vineet V. [4 ]
Vera, Ramiro [1 ]
Gross, Allan E. [4 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Traumatol Santiago, Santiago 8340220, RM, Chile
[2] MEDS Sports Clin, Santiago, Chile
[3] Mansoura Univ, Mansoura, Egypt
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Arthroplasty, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Hip revision; Vancouver classification; Periprosthetic fractures; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR FRACTURES; CLASSIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-015-2957-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Periprosthetic fractures are the fourth most common cause for hip revision and a devastating complication. Our purpose is to report results and quality of life following revision THA for Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures. Methods This was a retrospective review from January 2000 to November 2012 to identify all revision THA performed for Vancouver types B2 and B3 that had a minimum follow-up of two years. Routine post-operative and radiographic evaluation to assess patient survival, implant failure, complications and quality of life was involved. Statistical analysis was made with the Kaplan-Meier survival curve with 95 % confidence interval and the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Results A total of 76 fractures were included, with an average follow-up 74.4 months. Mean age at the revision surgery was 75.7 years (range, 41-97 years; SD, 12.4). Sixty-six cases were classified as Vancouver B2 and treated with distal fixation stem. Ten cases were Vancouver B3 and a proximal femoral allograft technique was used. The overall five-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate for the patients was 77.9 % (95 % CI, 67.4-88.4), and the ten-year rate was 65.1 % (95 % CI, 51.4-78.8). Five-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate for the implants was 89.6 % (95 % CI, 82.2-97); we presented seven failures. The mean SF-12 mental was 55.1 (range, 31-68; SD, 8.1) and the physical was 37.4 (range, 16-55; SD, 9.4). Conclusion Mortality rate after periprosthetic fractures is high as compared to other hip surgeries; our Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that it tends to plateau after five years. In our series the failure rate was low and occurred early in the post-operative period.
引用
收藏
页码:1927 / 1932
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with revision total hip arthroplasty
    Tomas Amenabar
    Wael A. Rahman
    Vineet V. Avhad
    Ramiro Vera
    Allan E. Gross
    Paul R. Kuzyk
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1927 - 1932
  • [2] Immediate weightbearing is safe after revision total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic femur fractures
    Gopinath, Rohan
    Oster, Brittany A.
    Mixa, Patrick J.
    Costales, Timothy G.
    Johnson, Aaron J.
    Manson, Theodore T.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (03):
  • [3] Outcomes After Operative Fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures
    Barghi, Ameen
    Hanna, Philip
    Merchan, Nelson
    Lechtig, Aron
    Haggerty, Christopher
    Weaver, Michael J.
    von Keudell, Arvind
    Wixted, John
    Appleton, Paul
    Rodriguez, Edward
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2022, 36 (05) : 228 - 233
  • [4] Mid-term outcomes following transfemoral revision of total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures
    Schofl, Thomas
    Calek, Anna-Katharina
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Zurmuhle, Pia
    Ladurner, Andreas
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (02): : 653 - 660
  • [5] Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review
    Stoffel, Karl
    Blauth, Michael
    Joeris, Alexander
    Blumenthal, Andrea
    Rometsch, Elke
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (10) : 1381 - 1394
  • [6] Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty
    Gonzalez-Martin, David
    Pais-Brito, Jose Luis
    Gonzalez-Casamayor, Sergio
    Guerra-Ferraz, Ayron
    Ojeda-Jimenez, Jorge
    Herrera-Perez, Mario
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2022, 7 (08) : 533 - 541
  • [7] Uncemented revision hip arthroplasty in B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures - A prospective analysis
    Rayan, Faizal
    Konan, Sujith
    Haddad, Fares S.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 20 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [8] Stem revision vs. internal fixation in vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic hip fractures: systematic review and metanalysis
    Di Martino, Alberto
    Brunello, Matteo
    Villari, Eleonora
    D'Agostino, Claudio
    Cosentino, Monica
    Bordini, Barbara
    Rivera, Fabrizio
    Faldini, Cesare
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (08) : 3787 - 3796
  • [9] Outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients
    Moreta, Jesus
    Uriarte, Iker
    Ormaza, Amaia
    Mosquera, Javier
    Iza, Kattalin
    Aguirre, Urko
    Jose Legarreta, Maria
    Luis Martinez-De Los Mozos, Jose
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [10] REVISION ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF VANCOUVER TYPE-B2 AND B3 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Haider, Thomas
    Hanna, Philip
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Merchan, Nelson
    McNichol, Megan
    Wixted, John J.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Nazarian, Ara
    von Keudell, Arvind G.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (08)