Paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis is defined by increased ventricular hydraulic load and reduced longitudinal strain

被引:2
|
作者
Holmes, Anthony A. [1 ]
Taub, Cynthia C. [2 ]
Garcia, Mario J. [2 ]
Shan, Jian [1 ]
Slovut, David P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Med, 111 East 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
hydraulic load; longitudinal strain; paradoxical low flow; PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION; LOW-GRADIENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DYNAMICS; HYPERTROPHY; PREDICTORS; AFTERLOAD; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.2459/JCM.0000000000000324
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis (PLF-AS) reportedly have higher left ventricular hydraulic load and more systolic strain dysfunction than patients with normal-flow aortic stenosis. This study investigates the relationship of systolic loading and strain to PLF-AS to further define its pathophysiology. Methods One hundred and twenty patients (age 79 +/- 12years, 37% men) with an indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) of 0.6cm(2)/m(2) or less and an ejection fraction of 50% or higher were divided into two groups based on indexed stroke volume (SVi): PLF-AS, SVi <= 35ml/m(2), N=46; normal-flow aortic stenosis, SVi > 35ml/m(2), N=74). Valvular and arterial load were assessed using multiple measurements, and strain was assessed using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Results Patients with PLF-AS were found to have more valvular load (lower AVAi, P=0.028; lower energy loss coefficient, P=0.001), more arterial load [decreased arterial compliance and increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR), both P<0.001] and more total hydraulic load [increased valvuloarterial impedance (Zva), P<0.001]. Transvalvular gradients and arterial pressures were similar. Longitudinal strain was lower in PLF-AS (P<0.001), but circumferential and rotation strains were similar. On adjusted regression, AVAi, SVR and longitudinal strain were associated with PLF-AS [odds ratio (OR)=1.34, P=0.043; OR=1.31, P=0.004; OR=1.34, P=0.011, respectively]. When SVR and AVAi were replaced with Zva, longitudinal strain and Zva (OR=1.38, P=0.015; OR=1.33, P<0.001 for both, respectively) were associated with PLF-AS. Conclusion Increased hydraulic load, from more severe valvular stenosis and increased vascular resistance, and longitudinal strain impairment are associated with PLF-AS and their interplay is likely fundamental to its pathophysiology.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis New Evidence, More Questions
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (16) : 1729 - 1732
  • [12] Paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis - baseline characteristics, impact on mortality
    Zbronski, Karol
    Huczek, Zenon
    Gawalko, Monika
    Cwiek, Agata
    Rymuza, Bartosz
    Grodecki, Kajetan
    Scislo, Piotr
    Wilimski, Radostaw
    Kochmanl, Janusz
    Filipiak, Krzysztof J.
    Opolski, Grzegorz
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2019, 15 (01): : 13 - 19
  • [13] Low Relative Valve Load is Associated With Paradoxical Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Adverse Clinical Outcomes
    Ngiam, Jinghao N.
    Chew, Nicholas W. S.
    Pramotedham, Thanawin
    Tan, Benjamin Y. Q.
    Sim, Hui-Wen
    Ruan, Wen
    Sia, Ching-Hui
    Kong, William K. F.
    Yeo, Tiong-Cheng
    Poh, Kian-Keong
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2022, 31 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [14] Diagnosis of paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis: A complex process!
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    Rusinaru, Dan
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 110 (03) : 135 - 138
  • [15] True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Okuno, Taishi
    Corpataux, Noe
    Spano, Giancarlo
    Grani, Christoph
    Heg, Dik
    Brugger, Nicolas
    Lanz, Jonas
    Praz, Fabien
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Windecker, Stephan
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2021, 7 (04) : 366 - 377
  • [16] Deterioration of Myocardial Function in Paradoxical Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis: Two-Dimensional Strain Analysis
    Lee, Seung-Pyo
    Kim, Yong-Jin
    Kim, Ji-Hyun
    Park, Kyungil
    Kim, Kyung-Hee
    Kim, Hyung-Kwan
    Cho, Goo-Yeong
    Sohn, Dae-Won
    Oh, Byung-Hee
    Park, Young-Bae
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (09) : 976 - 983
  • [17] Progression of Low-Gradient, Low-Flow, Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    Rusinaru, Dan
    Charles, Vincent
    Boulif, Jamila
    Maes, Frederic
    Levy, Franck
    Pasquet, Agnes
    Marechaux, Sylvestre
    Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 116 (04) : 612 - 617
  • [18] Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Adding New Pieces to the Puzzle
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (04) : 413 - 415
  • [19] Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Carabello, Blase
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) : 281 - 289
  • [20] Classical and Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis The Evolving Role of TAVR
    Freitas-Ferraz, Afonso B.
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (08) : 764 - 766