Paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis is defined by increased ventricular hydraulic load and reduced longitudinal strain

被引:2
|
作者
Holmes, Anthony A. [1 ]
Taub, Cynthia C. [2 ]
Garcia, Mario J. [2 ]
Shan, Jian [1 ]
Slovut, David P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Med, 111 East 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
hydraulic load; longitudinal strain; paradoxical low flow; PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION; LOW-GRADIENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DYNAMICS; HYPERTROPHY; PREDICTORS; AFTERLOAD; MORTALITY; DIAGNOSIS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.2459/JCM.0000000000000324
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis (PLF-AS) reportedly have higher left ventricular hydraulic load and more systolic strain dysfunction than patients with normal-flow aortic stenosis. This study investigates the relationship of systolic loading and strain to PLF-AS to further define its pathophysiology. Methods One hundred and twenty patients (age 79 +/- 12years, 37% men) with an indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) of 0.6cm(2)/m(2) or less and an ejection fraction of 50% or higher were divided into two groups based on indexed stroke volume (SVi): PLF-AS, SVi <= 35ml/m(2), N=46; normal-flow aortic stenosis, SVi > 35ml/m(2), N=74). Valvular and arterial load were assessed using multiple measurements, and strain was assessed using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Results Patients with PLF-AS were found to have more valvular load (lower AVAi, P=0.028; lower energy loss coefficient, P=0.001), more arterial load [decreased arterial compliance and increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR), both P<0.001] and more total hydraulic load [increased valvuloarterial impedance (Zva), P<0.001]. Transvalvular gradients and arterial pressures were similar. Longitudinal strain was lower in PLF-AS (P<0.001), but circumferential and rotation strains were similar. On adjusted regression, AVAi, SVR and longitudinal strain were associated with PLF-AS [odds ratio (OR)=1.34, P=0.043; OR=1.31, P=0.004; OR=1.34, P=0.011, respectively]. When SVR and AVAi were replaced with Zva, longitudinal strain and Zva (OR=1.38, P=0.015; OR=1.33, P<0.001 for both, respectively) were associated with PLF-AS. Conclusion Increased hydraulic load, from more severe valvular stenosis and increased vascular resistance, and longitudinal strain impairment are associated with PLF-AS and their interplay is likely fundamental to its pathophysiology.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis
    ten Freyhaus, H.
    Baldus, S.
    INTERNIST, 2016, 57 (04): : 317 - 322
  • [2] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
    Rodriguez-Gabella, Tania
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Auffret, Vincent
    Asmarats, Lluis
    Islas, Fabian
    Maes, Frederic
    Ferreira-Neto, Alfredo Nunes
    Paradis, Jean-Michel
    Dumont, Eric
    Cote, Melanie
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Macaya, Carlos
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 122 (04) : 625 - 632
  • [3] Diagnosis and management of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis
    Salemi, Arash
    Hameed, Irbaz
    Khan, Faiza M.
    Gaudino, Mario
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (02) : 87 - 94
  • [4] Development of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis
    Dahl, Jordi S.
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    Pislaru, Sorin V.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Connolly, Heidi M.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    HEART, 2015, 101 (13) : 1015 - 1023
  • [5] Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of "Paradoxical" Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis
    O'Sullivan, Crochan J.
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Wenaweser, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (16) : 1492 - 1493
  • [6] Low-flow low-gradient aortic valve stenosis. Current evidence
    Tillwich, F.
    Sherif, M. A.
    Yuecel, S.
    Oener, A.
    Ince, H.
    HERZ, 2017, 42 (06) : 536 - 541
  • [7] Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of "Paradoxical" Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis Reply
    Flachskampf, Frank A.
    Klinghammer, Lutz
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (16) : 1493 - 1494
  • [8] Prognostic Value of Global Longitudinal Strain in Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Sato, Kimi
    Seo, Yoshihiro
    Ishizu, Tomoko
    Takeuchi, Masaaki
    Izumo, Masaki
    Suzuki, Kengo
    Yamashita, Eiji
    Oshima, Shigeru
    Akashi, Yoshihiro J.
    Otsuji, Yutaka
    Aonuma, Kazutaka
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (11) : 2750 - 2759
  • [9] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis patients
    Debry, Nicolas
    Sudre, Arnaud
    Amr, Gilles
    Delhaye, Cedric
    Schurtz, Guillaume
    Montaigne, David
    Koussa, Mohamad
    Modine, Thomas
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (04) : 797 - 804
  • [10] Prevalence and Long-Term Outcome of Aortic Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Mohty, Dania
    Boulogne, Cyrille
    Magne, Julien
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Echahidi, Najmeddine
    Cornu, Elisabeth
    Dumesnil, Jean
    Laskar, Marc
    Virot, Patrice
    Aboyans, Victor
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130 (11) : S25 - +