Evaluation of Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessment with Adults with Developmental Disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Davies, Gareth [1 ]
Chand, Carly [1 ]
Yu, C. T. [1 ]
Martin, Toby L. [1 ]
Martin, Garry L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
PROFOUND DISABILITIES; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
We compared multiple-stimulus without replacement. (MSWO) and paired-stimulus (PS) procedures to assess stimulus preferences of adults with developmental disabilities. Stimulus preference rankings for six food items obtained by the two procedures were positively correlated for all participants (M = .72, range .41 to 1). However, four participants did not select the most-preferred stimuli identified by the PS assessments as their most-preferred stimuli during the MSWO assessments. Preferred-stimulus selection percentages for these participants generally increased during MSWO as the number of stimuli decreased across trials. For participants who selected the same stimuli as their most-preferred in both procedures, their preferred-stimulus selection percentages generally declined during MSWO as the number of stimuli decreased across trials.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Evaluation of a Brief Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment Conducted in an Electronic Pictorial Format
    Brodhead, Matthew T.
    Abel, Emily A.
    Al-Dubayan, Monerah N.
    Brouwers, Lauren
    Abston, Gina Warren
    Rispoli, Mandy J.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL EDUCATION, 2016, 25 (04) : 417 - 430
  • [2] UTILITY OF THE MULTIPLE-STIMULUS WITHOUT REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE AND STABILITY OF PREFERENCES OF OLDER ADULTS WITH DEMENTIA
    Raetz, Paige B.
    LeBlanc, Linda A.
    Baker, Jonathan C.
    Hilton, Laura C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2013, 46 (04) : 765 - 780
  • [3] EVALUATION OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT METHODS WITH GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
    Schanding, G. Thomas, Jr.
    Tingstrom, Daniel H.
    Sterling-Turner, Heather E.
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2009, 46 (02) : 89 - 99
  • [4] A Friendships and Dating Program for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Formative Evaluation
    Ward, Karen M.
    Atkinson, Julie P.
    Smith, Curtis A.
    Windsor, Richard
    INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 51 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [5] An examination of stimulus technology level and preference displacement during multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments
    Hoffmann, Audrey N.
    Paskins, Ryan T.
    Brady-Ruehs, Anna M.
    Sellers, Tyra P.
    BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 38 (03) : 671 - 688
  • [6] Quality of diabetes care for adults with developmental disabilities
    Shireman, Theresa I.
    Reichard, Amanda
    Nazir, Niaman
    Backes, James M.
    Greiner, K. Allen
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2010, 3 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [7] Primary Care of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
    Daaleman, Timothy P.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 109 (01) : 12 - 16
  • [8] Analysis of four measures of positional bias within a multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessment
    Miranda, David Ray G.
    Brodhead, Matthew T.
    Sipila-Thomas, Emma S.
    Fisher, Marisa H.
    Plavnick, Joshua B.
    Thomas, Alexandria L.
    Melanson, Isaac J.
    BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 38 (02) : 401 - 426
  • [9] ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF PICTORIAL PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS FOR CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
    Heinicke, Megan R.
    Carr, James E.
    Pence, Sacha T.
    Zias, Danika R.
    Valentino, Amber L.
    Falligant, John M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2016, 49 (04) : 848 - 868
  • [10] A technology-aided stimulus choice program for two adults with multiple disabilities: Choice responses and mood
    Lancioni, Giulio E.
    Singh, Nirbhay N.
    O'Reilly, Mark F.
    Sigafoos, Jeff
    Alberti, Gloria
    Oliva, Doretta
    Buono, Serafino
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2011, 32 (06) : 2602 - 2607