Validation of a national hydrological model

被引:61
作者
McMillan, H. K. [1 ,2 ]
Booker, D. J. [1 ]
Cattoen, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, POB 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Rainfall-runoff model; National hydrological model; Validation; Hydrological regimes; Ungauged sites; WATER-RESOURCES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DATA ASSIMILATION; DAILY RAINFALL; LARGE-SCALE; DATA SET; CALIBRATION; STREAMFLOW; RUNOFF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.043
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Nationwide predictions of flow time-series are valuable for development of policies relating to environmental flows, calculating reliability of supply to water users, or assessing risk of floods or droughts. This breadth of model utility is possible because various hydrological signatures can be derived from simulated flow time-series. However, producing national hydrological simulations can be challenging due to strong environmental diversity across catchments and a lack of data available to aid model parameterisation. A comprehensive and consistent suite of test procedures to quantify spatial and temporal patterns in performance across various parts of the hydrograph is described and applied to quantify the performance of an uncalibrated national rainfall-runoff model of New Zealand. Flow time-series observed at 485 gauging stations were used to calculate Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and percent bias when simulating between-site differences in daily series, between-year differences in annual series, and between-site differences in hydrological signatures. The procedures were used to assess the benefit of applying a correction to the modelled flow duration curve based on an independent statistical analysis. They were used to aid understanding of climatological, hydrological and model-based causes of differences in predictive performance by assessing multiple hypotheses that describe where and when the model was expected to perform best. As the procedures produce quantitative measures of performance, they provide an objective basis for model assessment that could be applied when comparing observed daily flow series with competing simulated flow series from any region-wide or nationwide hydrological model. Model performance varied in space and time with better scores in larger and medium-wet catchments, and in catchments with smaller seasonal variations. Surprisingly, model performance was not sensitive to aquifer fraction or rain gauge density. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 815
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Influence of soil depth and spatial resolution on the performance of the DHSVM hydrological model in basins with low input data availability [J].
Mendes, Helder de Amorim ;
Cecilio, Roberto Avelino ;
Zanetti, Sidney Sara .
JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 105
[42]   Effect of hydrological model selection in climate change impact assessment in the Dano tropical catchment (Burkina-Faso) [J].
Yira, Yacouba ;
Bossa, Aymar Y. ;
Ganda, Ngague Hisseine ;
Badou, Djigbo F. ;
Hounkpatin, Kpade O. Laurentin ;
Hounkpe, Jean ;
Sintondji, Luc Ollivier .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 18 (03) :285-299
[43]   Variations in hydrological variables using distributed hydrological model in permafrost environment [J].
Ahmed, Naveed ;
Wang, Genxu ;
Booij, Martijn J. ;
Marhaento, Hero ;
Pordhan, Foyez Ahmed ;
Ali, Shahid ;
Munir, Sarfraz ;
Hashmi, Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 145
[44]   Hydrological assessment of the Tungabhadra River Basin based on CMIP6 GCMs and multiple hydrological models [J].
Rudraswamy, G. K. ;
Manikanta, Velpuri ;
Umamahesh, Nanduri .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (05) :1371-1394
[45]   VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING SOIL MOISTURE PRODUCTS WITH A DISTRIBUTED CONTINUOUS HYDROLOGICAL MODEL [J].
Laiolo, Paola ;
Gabellani, Simone ;
Pulvirenti, Luca ;
Boni, Giorgio ;
Rudari, Roberto ;
Delogu, Fabio ;
Silvestro, Francesco ;
Campo, Lorenzo ;
Fascetti, Fabio ;
Pierdicca, Nazzareno ;
Crapolicchio, Raffaele ;
Hasenauer, Stefan ;
Puca, Silvia .
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2014,
[46]   Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change Simulated by HIMS Models in the Luanhe River Basin, North China [J].
Jiang, Yan ;
Liu, Changming ;
Li, Xuyong .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (04) :1365-1384
[47]   Understanding Spatio-Temporal Hydrological Dynamics Using SWAT: A Case Study in the Pativilca Basin [J].
Pachac-Huerta, Yenica ;
Lavado-Casimiro, Waldo ;
Zapana, Melania ;
Pena, Robinson .
HYDROLOGY, 2024, 11 (10)
[48]   Hydrological modeling of the watershed of a RAMSAR site using the SWAT model (Ichkeul National Park—Tunisia of the extreme north) [J].
Ayser Ben Saad ;
Moufida Ben M’barek-Jemai ;
Nabiha Ben M’barek ;
Safa Mezza .
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9 :2783-2795
[49]   Reducing the uncertainty of time-varying hydrological model parameters using spatial coherence within a hierarchical Bayesian framework [J].
Pan, Zhengke ;
Liu, Pan ;
Gao, Shida ;
Cheng, Lei ;
Chen, Jie ;
Zhang, Xiaojing .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
[50]   Can model-based data products replace gauge data as input to the hydrological model? [J].
Sivasubramaniam, K. ;
Alfredsen, K. ;
Rinde, T. ;
Saether, B. .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (02) :188-201