Validation of a national hydrological model

被引:59
作者
McMillan, H. K. [1 ,2 ]
Booker, D. J. [1 ]
Cattoen, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, POB 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Rainfall-runoff model; National hydrological model; Validation; Hydrological regimes; Ungauged sites; WATER-RESOURCES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DATA ASSIMILATION; DAILY RAINFALL; LARGE-SCALE; DATA SET; CALIBRATION; STREAMFLOW; RUNOFF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.043
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Nationwide predictions of flow time-series are valuable for development of policies relating to environmental flows, calculating reliability of supply to water users, or assessing risk of floods or droughts. This breadth of model utility is possible because various hydrological signatures can be derived from simulated flow time-series. However, producing national hydrological simulations can be challenging due to strong environmental diversity across catchments and a lack of data available to aid model parameterisation. A comprehensive and consistent suite of test procedures to quantify spatial and temporal patterns in performance across various parts of the hydrograph is described and applied to quantify the performance of an uncalibrated national rainfall-runoff model of New Zealand. Flow time-series observed at 485 gauging stations were used to calculate Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and percent bias when simulating between-site differences in daily series, between-year differences in annual series, and between-site differences in hydrological signatures. The procedures were used to assess the benefit of applying a correction to the modelled flow duration curve based on an independent statistical analysis. They were used to aid understanding of climatological, hydrological and model-based causes of differences in predictive performance by assessing multiple hypotheses that describe where and when the model was expected to perform best. As the procedures produce quantitative measures of performance, they provide an objective basis for model assessment that could be applied when comparing observed daily flow series with competing simulated flow series from any region-wide or nationwide hydrological model. Model performance varied in space and time with better scores in larger and medium-wet catchments, and in catchments with smaller seasonal variations. Surprisingly, model performance was not sensitive to aquifer fraction or rain gauge density. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 815
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrological model parameter instability: A source of additional uncertainty in estimating the hydrological impacts of climate change?
    Brigode, Pierre
    Oudin, Ludovic
    Perrin, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 476 : 410 - 425
  • [22] Hydrological Simulation Model on Climate Change Impact of a Lower Bhavani Basin Using GIS and SWAT
    Madasamy, Nagarajan
    Meiyappan, Valliammai
    Muthiah, Manikandan
    Elango, Sujitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2025,
  • [23] Assessment of hydrological behavioural changes of Noyyal watershed in Coimbatore district, India by using SWAT model
    Arumugam, Thangavelu
    Kinattinkara, Sapna
    Velusamy, Sampathkumar
    Shanmugamoorthy, Manoj
    Veerasamy, Senthilkumar
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2025, 59
  • [24] Fields of Application of SWAT Hydrological Model-A Review
    Janjic, Josip
    Tadic, Lidija
    [J]. EARTH, 2023, 4 (02): : 331 - 344
  • [25] Satellite-Based Evapotranspiration in Hydrological Model Calibration
    Jiang, Lulu
    Wu, Huan
    Tao, Jing
    Kimball, John S.
    Alfieri, Lorenzo
    Chen, Xiuwan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [26] Comparing Spatial and temporal transferability of hydrological model parameters
    Patil, Sopan D.
    Stieglitz, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 525 : 409 - 417
  • [27] On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
    Baez-Villanueva, Oscar M.
    Zambrano-Bigiarini, Mauricio
    Mendoza, Pablo A.
    McNamara, Ian
    Beck, Hylke E.
    Thurner, Joschka
    Nauditt, Alexandra
    Ribbe, Lars
    Thinh, Nguyen Xuan
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (11) : 5805 - 5837
  • [28] Validation of a mesoscale hydrological model in a small-scale forested catchment
    Sipek, Vaclav
    Tesar, Miroslav
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (01): : 27 - 41
  • [29] Investigating the effects of climate change on future hydrological drought in mountainous basins using SWAT model based on CMIP5 model
    Samavati, Alireza
    Babamiri, Omid
    Rezai, Yousef
    Heidarimozaffar, Morteza
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (03) : 849 - 875
  • [30] Spatial validation of a semi-distributed hydrological nutrient transport model
    Ghaffar, Salman
    Jomaa, Seifeddine
    Meon, Guenter
    Rode, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 593