Dynamics in sexually active groups of Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) comparing two procedures for estrus induction

被引:5
作者
Acevedo, Nuria [2 ]
Gatina, Carlos S. [2 ]
Pulido, Angel [3 ]
Orihuela, Agustin [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ State Morelos, Fac Agr & Livestock Sci, Cuernavaca 62210, Morelos, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Vet Med & Zootecn, Dept Reprod, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Ctr Teaching Res & Extens Trop Livestock, Veracruz, Mexico
关键词
estrus synchronization; sexual behavior; zebu cattle; CIDR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jveb.2006.12.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two schemes for estrous synchronization with a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) were compared in a herd of 17 zebu cows. In the first state, 3 subgroups were formed at random (n =6,6, and 5, respectively) and synchronized at 2-day intervals. All 3 subgroups received the same treatment. In the second stage, 25 days of CIDR withdrawal of the last subgroup, the treatment each subgroup received was applied to the combined herd (n = 17) simultaneously. Sexual activity was monitored by continuous observation from first subgroup CIDR withdrawal to 100 hours after the last implant from the third subgroup was removed, and for 100 hours after CIDR withdrawal following whole herd treatment. When subgroups were compared with group synchronization, fewer cows displayed estrus in subgroup treatments than in group synchronization (64%[66%, 16%, and 20% for subgroups 1, 2, and 3, respectively] vs. 35%; P=0.08), there were longer periods form CIDR withdrawal to estrus onset in subgroup treatments (141.6 +/- 6 vs 27 +/- 3 h; P < 0.01), and estrus was shorter in subgroup treatments (19.0 +/- 6.1 vs. 34.1 +/- 4.5 h; P < 0.01). Estrous cows from the subgroup treatments were mounted by fewer herdmates (1.67 +/- 0.33 vs. 4.55 +/- 1.0 cows; P < 0.01), and most mounts in this group were merely riders (84% vs. 14%; P < 0.01). Estrous signs were more intense (P < 0.05) when the herd was treated as a group rather than in subgroups, displaying more mounts and attempts to mount (1.10 +/- 0.30 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.05 and 0.20 +/- 0.70 vs. 0.05 +/- 0.29 frequency/cow/hour in estrus, respectively). No relationship was found between the number of Sexual partners for each individual cow and estrous intensity or length (r < 0.4 P > 0.05). It was concluded that (1) the social facilitation effect does not depend on the number of sexual participants with a given cow, and (2) cows that are not in estrus are more reluctant to interact Sexually, and when they do, they execute a reduced number of mounts. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 9
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Improvement of reproductive performance in crossbred zebu anestrous primiparous cows by treatment with norgestomet implants or 96 h calf removal [J].
Belloso, ES ;
Martínez, GP ;
De Ondiz, A ;
Rojas, N ;
Castillo, GS ;
Iglesia, LR ;
Ganchou, FP .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2002, 57 (05) :1503-1510
[2]  
BLOCKEY MAD, 1981, APPL ANIM ETHOL, V7, P321
[3]   Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle [J].
Bó, GA ;
Baruselli, PS ;
Martínez, MF .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 78 (3-4) :307-326
[4]   ESTRUS DETECTION TECHNIQUES AND INSEMINATION STRATEGIES IN BOS-INDICUS HEIFERS SYNCHRONIZED WITH NORGESTOMET-ESTRADIOL [J].
CAVALIERI, J ;
FITZPATRICK, LA .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1995, 72 (05) :177-182
[5]   Effect of sexual partners on the oestrous behaviour response in Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) following synchronisation with a progestagen (Synchro-mate B) [J].
Cortés, R ;
Orihuela, JA ;
Galina, CS .
ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1999, 12 (04) :515-519
[6]   ESTROUS BEHAVIOR IN A HERD OF DAIRY-COWS/S [J].
ESSLEMONT, RJ ;
BRYANT, MJ .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1976, 99 (24) :472-475
[7]  
Galina C. S., 1990, Animal Breeding Abstracts, V58, P697
[8]   Behavioural trends affecting oestrus detection in Zebu cattle [J].
Galina, CS ;
Orihuela, A ;
Rubio, I .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (1-4) :465-470
[9]  
IZARD MK, 1982, J REPROD FERTIL, V66, P189, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0660189
[10]  
KILGOUR R, 1977, Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, V37, P128