Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation

被引:66
|
作者
Hein, Lars [1 ]
Miller, Daniel C. [2 ]
de Groot, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; PROTECTED AREAS; EFFICIENCY; PARKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is generally recognized that addressing the ongoing loss of global biodiversity requires a substantial increase in funding for conservation activities, particularly in developing countries. An increasing interest in Payment Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services (PES) begs the question of whether a focus on developing payment mechanisms will also reduce the ongoing loss of global biodiversity. We review, firstly, current flows of funds for biodiversity conservation, including PES and other market mechanisms, and secondly, the opportunities and constraints of PES to contribute to biodiversity protection globally. We argue that PES can and should make an important contribution, but that it will not be sufficient to rely on PES alone to finance the actions necessary to substantially reduce biodiversity loss. In response to the identified constraints, we believe there is a need to develop additional funding mechanisms specifically targeted at biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic Valuation of Conservation of Inholdings in Protected Areas for the Institution of Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Oh, Chi-Ok
    Lee, Sangkwon
    Kim, Hyun No
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (12): : 1 - 16
  • [22] Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: A review
    Cimon-Morin, Jerome
    Darveau, Marcel
    Poulin, Monique
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 166 : 144 - 154
  • [23] The co-benefits of biodiversity conservation programmes on wider ecosystem services
    Austin, Zoe
    McVittie, Alistair
    McCracken, Davy
    Moxey, Andrew
    Moran, Dominic
    White, Piran C. L.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 : 37 - 43
  • [24] Connectivity conservation a the crossroads: protected areas versus payments for ecosystem services in conserving connectivity for Colombian carnivores
    Zarrate Charry, Diego A.
    Gonzalez-Maya, Jose F.
    Arias-Alzate, Andres
    Sebastian Jimenez-Alvarado, J.
    Reyes Arias, Jessica Dayanh
    Armenteras, Dolors
    Betts, Matthew G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [25] Integrating ecosystem services within spatial biodiversity conservation prioritization in the Alps
    Ramel, Cindy
    Rey, Pierre-Louis
    Fernandes, Rui
    Vincent, Claire
    Cardoso, Ana R.
    Broennimann, Olivier
    Pellissier, Loic
    Pradervand, Jean-Nicolas
    Ursenbacher, Sylvain
    Schmidt, Benedikt R.
    Guisan, Antoine
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [26] Spatial associations of ecosystem services and biodiversity as a baseline for systematic conservation planning
    Manhaes, Adriana Pellegrini
    Mazzochini, Guilherme Gerhardt
    Oliveira-Filho, Ary Teixeira
    Ganade, Gislene
    Carvalho, Adriana Rosa
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (09) : 932 - 943
  • [27] Spatial targeting of payments for ecosystem services to achieve conservation goals and promote social equity and economic impact
    Soh, Moonwon
    Cho, Seong-Hoon
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2019, 32 (04)
  • [28] When payments for ecosystem conservation stop
    Rode, Julian
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (01) : 15 - 16
  • [29] Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services?
    Robert, Nicolas
    Stenger, Anne
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 : 83 - 91
  • [30] Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Qi
    Peterson, M. Nils
    Song, Conghe
    AMBIO, 2019, 48 (07) : 732 - 740