Liquefaction versus Torsional IP: A Comparative Study on Endothelial Cells, Corneal Edema and Corneal Sensitivity

被引:6
作者
Labiris, Georgios [1 ]
Gatzioufas, Zisis [2 ]
Giarmoukakis, Athanassios [1 ]
Sideroudi, Haris [1 ]
Kozobolis, Vassilios P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Alexandroupolis, Dept Ophthalmol, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
[2] Univ Clin Saarland UKS, Dept Ophthalmol, Homburg, Germany
关键词
Liquefaction; Torsional IP; Endothelial cells; Corneal edema; Corneal sensitivity; CATARACT-SURGERY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; VISTHESIA; MODE;
D O I
10.1159/000342974
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background/Aims: To compare the impact of liquefaction and torsional IP cataract extraction methods on endothelial cell count (ECC), central corneal edema, and central corneal sensitivity (CCS) in a sample of cataract patients. Methods: The liquefaction (LG) and torsional IP (TG) group consisted of 47 and 48 grade 2 cataract eyes, respectively. Uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, ECC, central corneal thickness (CCT), and CCS were measured 1 day prior to surgery, 10 days, 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: Significant difficulties in the nucleus fragmentation were encountered in 2 LG eyes, and they were excluded from the study. Both techniques provided excellent refractive outcomes (LG, p < 0.001; TG, p = 0.02). Nonsignificant differences were detected in CCT values at the final postoperative examination; however, TG patients presented higher CCT on the first postoperative day (p = 0.04). Both groups presented comparable significant reductions in ECC (LG, p < 0.001; TG, p < 0.001) and CCS (LG, p = 0.02; TG, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Both methods provide excellent refractive outcomes, with comparable impact on ECC and CCS. Liquefaction seems to provide less corneal edema; however, difficulties in nucleus fragmentation may be encountered even in grade 2 cataracts. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas [J].
Belmonte, C ;
Acosta, MC ;
Gallar, J .
EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2004, 78 (03) :513-525
[2]   Comparison of conventional and torsional mode (OZil) phacoemulsification: randomized prospective clinical study [J].
Bozkurt, Ercuement ;
Bayraktar, Sukru ;
Yazgan, Serpil ;
Cakir, Mehmet ;
Cekic, Osman ;
Erdogan, Havva ;
Yilmaz, Omer F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 19 (06) :984-989
[3]   THE LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM-III [J].
CHYLACK, LT ;
WOLFE, JK ;
SINGER, DM ;
LESKE, MC ;
BULLIMORE, MA ;
BAILEY, IL ;
FRIEND, J ;
MCCARTHY, D ;
WU, SY .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (06) :831-836
[4]   Length and frequency of intraoperative occlusive events with new torsional phacoemulsification software [J].
Cionni, Robert J. ;
Crandall, Alan S. ;
Felsted, David .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (10) :1785-1790
[5]  
Desai P, 1999, BR J OPHTHALMOL, V85, P222
[6]   New phacoemulsification technologies [J].
Fine, IH ;
Packer, M ;
Hoffman, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (06) :1054-1060
[7]   Heat production: Longitudinal versus torsional phacoemulsification [J].
Han, Young Keun ;
Miller, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (10) :1799-1805
[8]   Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification [J].
Hayashi, K ;
Hayashi, H ;
Nakao, F ;
Hayashi, F .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (08) :1079-1084
[9]  
Hoffman Richard S, 2005, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V16, P38, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200502000-00007
[10]   Aqualase for cataract extraction [J].
Hughes, E. H. ;
Mellington, F. E. ;
Whitefield, L. A. .
EYE, 2007, 21 (02) :191-194