Shifting Profile of Leadership Preparation Programs in the 21st Century

被引:18
作者
Perrone, Frank [1 ]
Tucker, Pamela D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Teacher Educ Educ Leadership & Policy, Coll Educ, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Curry Sch Educ, Educ, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
principal preparation; leadership preparation; higher education; policy; academic degrees; preparation programs; TRANSFORMATIONAL SCHOOL LEADERSHIP; TEACHER; PIPELINE; COLLEGE; SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; PRINCIPALSHIP; EXPERIENCES; SELECTIVITY;
D O I
10.1177/0013161X18799473
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: A substantial research base focuses on principal preparation program standards, design, and effectiveness. Little is known, however, about which institutions are preparing principal candidates and how many candidates they have produced since 2003. Our study provides the field with a better understanding of the overall preparation landscape and addresses issues of principal supply and demand. Research Methods: We use several national datasets in this exploratory study to track changes in educational administration degree production at the national, state, and university level from 2000 to 2014 as well as how these compare with changing K-12 student populations and principal demand. Findings: Key findings include (a) the number of institutions granting degrees in educational administration increased by 72% this century, (b) the total number of leadership degrees granted doubled over this time period and is substantially larger at all award levels (i.e., postbaccalaureate, master's, specialist, doctorate) in 2014 than 2000, and (c) the types of institutions offering educational leadership degrees and their production rates have changed dramatically over this time period. Implications: The supply of principal candidates far exceeds the number annual principal openings offering school systems greater choice among candidates. Further research is needed on the issues of readiness and career intentions of the candidates. The majority of growth in program offerings and degrees granted has been generated in less-resourced and less selective institutions. Researchers in the field have argued that adequate resources are critical to providing program components for effective principal preparation thus raising questions about the quality of program candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 295
页数:43
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]  
Bryk A.S., 2010, ORG SCH IMPROVEMENT
[22]  
Burkhauser S., 2012, 1 YEAR PRINCIPALS UR
[23]  
*CARN FDN ADV TEAC, 1994, CLASS I HIGH ED
[24]  
Chiang H., 2012, Is School Value-Added Indicative of Principal Quality?
[25]  
Chingos M.M., 2014, Who Profits from the Master's Degree Pay Bump for Teachers?
[26]  
Clayton JK, 2013, J RES LEADERSH EDUC, V8, P77, DOI 10.1177/1942775112464959
[27]   Cultivating Exemplary School Leadership Preparation at a Research Intensive University [J].
Cosner, Shelby ;
Tozer, Steve ;
Zavitkovsky, Paul ;
Whalen, Samuel P. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON LEADERSHIP EDUCATION, 2015, 10 (01) :11-38
[28]   Effective Preparation Program Features: A Literature Review [J].
Crow, Gary M. ;
Whiteman, Rodney S. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON LEADERSHIP EDUCATION, 2016, 11 (01) :120-148
[29]   Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables [J].
Dale, SB ;
Krueger, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (04) :1491-1527
[30]  
Darling-Hammond L., 2009, Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs