Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, P. [1 ]
Chen, F. [2 ]
Zhou, B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Pharm, Renmin Hosp, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Med, Dongfeng Hosp, Dept Pharm, Shiyan, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
METASTATIC MELANOMA; BRAF; DABRAFENIB; THERAPY; COMBINATION; INHIBITION; TRAMETINIB; RESISTANCE; EFFICACY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1111/ced.13751
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Vemurafenib has been linked to dermatological adverse events in patients with melanoma, including an increased risk of rash, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, photosensitivity reaction and keratoacanthoma. However, there has been no systematic attempt to assess the dermatological toxicity data of vemurafenib associated with melanoma treatment. Aim To evaluate the point prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma. Methods Searches were conducted of the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE and of conference abstracts published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials and expanded-access programmes (i.e. outside a clinical trial) of patients with melanoma assigned to vemurafenib treatment. Outcomes included prevalence of dermatological toxicities treated with vemurafenib. Statistical analyses were performed using the R2.8.1 meta package. Results In total, 11 studies comprising 4197 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For patients assigned to vemurafenib, the overall prevalence of all-grade cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) was 18.00% (95% CI 12.00-26.00%), rash 45.00% (95% CI 34.00-57.00%), photosensitivity reaction (PR) 30.00% (95% CI 23.00-38.00%), keratoacanthoma (KA) 10.00% (95% CI 6.00-15.00%) and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) 9.00% (95% CI 4.00-20.00%), while the prevalence of high-grade events was: cSCC 16.00% (95% CI 11.00-23.00%), rash 12.00% (95% CI 3.00-38.00%), PR 4% (95% CI 2.00-8.00%) and KA 6.00% (95% CI 5.00-7.00%). Conclusion The most frequent dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma were cSCC, rash, PR and KA. These data may be useful for estimation of the efficacy and safety of the drug during clinical treatment and for reducing the prevalence of adverse reactions to vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 251
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review and meta-analysis efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients with anti-PD-1 progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alrabadi, N. N.
    Abushukair, H. M.
    Ababneh, O. E.
    Syaj, S. S.
    Al-Horani, S. S.
    Qarqash, A. A.
    Darabseh, O. A.
    Al-Sous, M. M.
    Al-Aomar, S. R.
    Ahmed, Y. B.
    Haddad, R.
    Al Qarqaz, F. A.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (09) : 1885 - 1904
  • [22] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of diarrhea associated with vandetanib treatment in carcinoma patients
    Huo, Zijun
    Yu, Shuang
    Hong, Shubin
    Cao, Xiaopei
    Xiu, Lingling
    Liao, Zhihong
    Li, Yanbing
    Xiao, Haipeng
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 3621 - 3631
  • [23] Ketoconazole Associated Hepatotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yan Jiang Ying
    Nie Xiao Lu
    Tao Qing Mei
    Zhan Si Yan
    Zhang Yan De
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2013, 26 (07) : 605 - 610
  • [24] Is cysteamine use effective in the treatment of melasma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    dos Santos-Neto, Agenor Gomes
    Valerio da Silva, Isis Carolline
    Melo, Carlisson Ramos
    Moraes Santana, Adilson Allef
    Cavalcanti de Albuquerque-Junior, Ricardo Luiz
    DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2022, 35 (12)
  • [25] Risk of mucocutaneous toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with sorafenib: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdel-Rahman, Omar
    Fouad, Mona
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (06) : 751 - 760
  • [26] A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the antibiotic treatment courses in AECOPD
    Yu, Haichuan
    Lei, Ting
    Su, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Lu
    Feng, Zhouzhou
    Chen, Xinlong
    Liu, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [27] Prevalence of Fungal Infections in Pemphigus Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Javidnia, Javad
    Daneshpazhooh, Maryam
    Arghavan, Bahareh
    MYCOSES, 2024, 67 (12)
  • [28] Prevalence and associated factors of treatment failure among children on ART in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gelaw, Belete
    Dessalegn, Lemma
    Alem, Eyasu
    Tekalign, Tiwabwork
    Lankirew, Tadele
    Eshetu, Kirubel
    Marew, Chalie
    Chekole, Bogale
    Kassaw, Amare
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [29] Effectiveness of multicomponent treatment in patients with fibromyalgia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe
    Gutierrez-Espinoza, Hector
    Fuentes, Jorge
    Prieto-Lafrentz, Fernanda
    Pavez, Leonardo
    Cristi-Montero, Carlos
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [30] Laser treatment for onychomycosis A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Weiwei
    Si, Chenchen
    Carrero, Lorna Martin Kasyanju
    Liu, Hou-Fang
    Yin, Xu-Feng
    Liu, Juan
    Xu, Yang
    Zhou, Bingrong
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (48)