Risk factors for secondary displacement in conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures INTRODUCING TWO NEW RADIOLOGICAL PREDICTORS

被引:10
作者
Frank, F. A. [1 ]
Niehaus, R. [1 ]
Borbas, P. [1 ]
Eid, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital Baden AG, Baden, Switzerland
关键词
LOCAL BONE QUALITY; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; INTERNAL-FIXATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OPEN REDUCTION; SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2020-0045.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Conservative treatment of moderately displaced proximal humeral head fractures yields good clinical results, but secondary fragment displacement may occur. Identification of those fractures at risk of displacement may influence initial decision-making. Methods A total of 163 shoulders in 162 patients with conservatively treated isolated proximal humeral fractures were included. The fractures occurred between January 2015 and May 2018. The mean age of the patients was 69 years (26 to 100) and the mean follow-up was 144 days (42 to 779). The fractures were classified according to Neer. Scores for osteoporosis (Tingart, Deltoid Tuberosity Index (DTI)) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral joint were assessed. Translation of the head on follow-up radiographs of more than 10 mm was defined as displacement. Eccentric head index (EHI) describes the offset of the humeral head centre in relation to the diaphyseal axis. The ratio was estimated on anteroposterior (AP) and Neer views. Medial hinge was considered intact if the medial cortex proximal and distal to the fracture was in line on AP view. Results Secondary fracture displacement occurred in 41 patients (25.2%). Clinical risk factors were alcohol abuse (odds ratio (OR) 6.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 36; p = 0.025) and previously diagnosed osteoporosis (OR 4.6; 95% CI 0.6 to 34; p = 0.136). Age (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1; p = 0.003) and sex (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8; p = 0.867) were not independent factors. Radiological risk factors were OA grade 3 (OR 16.4; 95% CI 0.25 to 37.6; p = 0.107) and osteoporosis with the DTI (OR 10; 95% CI 0.8 to 250; p = 0.031) being more predictive than the Tingart score (OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.8 to 4.7; p = 0.041). A high EHI (AP/Neer > 0.4, OR 18.9; 95% CI 2.1 to 30.9/3.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 8.0; p = 0.002/p = 0.033) and a disrupted medial hinge (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 12.6; p = 0.039) increased the risk of secondary displacement significantly. Neer classification had no influence. Conclusion During conservative treatment, a quarter of patients showed secondary fracture displacement of at least 10 mm. Patients with alcohol abuse, severe OA, and osteoporosis are at risk. Newly defined EHI and disrupted medial hinge are relevant predictors for secondary displacement.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 889
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Does an early mobilization and immediate home-based self-therapy exercise program displace proximal humeral fractures in conservative treatment? Observational study
    Aguado, Hector J.
    Arino, Blanca
    Moreno-Mateo, Fernando
    Bustinza, Elias Y.
    Simon-Perez, Clarisa
    Martinez-Zarzuela, Mario
    Garcia-Virto, Virginia
    Ventura, Paula S.
    Angel Martin-Ferrero, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (11) : 2021 - 2029
  • [2] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V2nd
  • [3] Fracture non-union: Who is at risk?
    Copuroglu, Cem
    Calori, Giorgio M.
    Giannoudis, Peter V.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 (11): : 1379 - 1382
  • [4] The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures
    Court-Brown, CM
    Garg, A
    McQueen, MM
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 72 (04): : 365 - 371
  • [5] The impacted varus (A2.2) proximal humeral fracture - Prediction of outcome and results of nonoperative treatment in 99 patients
    Court-Brown, CM
    McQueen, MM
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 75 (06): : 736 - 740
  • [6] The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial - a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults
    Handoll, Helen
    Brealey, Stephen
    Rangan, Amar
    Keding, Ada
    Corbacho, Belen
    Jefferson, Laura
    Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
    Goodchild, Lorna
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Torgerson, David
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (24) : 1 - +
  • [7] Handoll HHG, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD003209.pub2]
  • [8] Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus
    Hanson, Beate
    Neidenbach, Philipp
    de Boer, Piet
    Stengel, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (04) : 612 - 621
  • [9] Operative versus non-operative treatment for two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus
    Hauschild, O.
    Konrad, G.
    Audige, L.
    de Boer, P.
    Lambert, S. M.
    Hertel, R.
    Suedkamp, N. P.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (10) : 1385 - 1393
  • [10] Hedges LV, 1981, J ED STAT, V6, P107, DOI [10.3102/10769986006002107, DOI 10.3102/10769986006002107]