Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

被引:1450
作者
Cooke, Alison [1 ]
Smith, Debbie [2 ]
Booth, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Manchester NHS Fdn Trust, St Marys Hosp, Maternal & Fetal Hlth Res Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
literature; metasynthesis; research; mixed methods; qualitative; systematic reviews; OPTIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; METASYNTHESIS; RELEVANT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/1049732312452938
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Standardized systematic search strategies facilitate rigor in research. Current search tools focus on retrieval of quantitative research. In this article we address issues relating to using existing search strategy tools, most typically the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) formulation for defining key elements of a review question, when searching for qualitative and mixed methods research studies. An alternative search strategy tool for qualitative/mixed methods research is outlined: SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type). We used both the SPIDER and PICO search strategy tools with a qualitative research question. We have used the SPIDER tool to advance thinking beyond PICO in its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research. However, we have highlighted once more the need for improved indexing of qualitative articles in databases. To constitute a viable alternative to PICO, SPIDER needs to be refined and tested on a wider range of topics.
引用
收藏
页码:1435 / 1443
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Never mind the qualitative feel the depth! The evolving role of qualitative research in Cochrane intervention reviews [J].
Noyes, Jane .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2010, 15 (06) :525-534
[32]  
OConnor D, 2008, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series, P81, DOI 10.1002/9780470712184.ch5
[33]  
Papaioannou D, 2010, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V27, P114, DOI [10.1111/J.1471-1842.2009.00863.x, 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x]
[34]  
Sandelowski M, 1997, RES NURS HEALTH, V20, P365, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO
[35]  
2-E
[36]  
Sandelowski M., 2007, Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research
[37]   Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions [J].
Schardt, Connie ;
Adams, Martha B. ;
Owens, Thomas ;
Keitz, Sheri ;
Fontelo, Paul .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2007, 7 (1)
[38]  
Shaw R., 2004, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V4, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-4-5, 10.1186/1471-2288-4-5]
[39]   The maternity experience for women with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2: a meta-synthesis [J].
Smith, D. ;
Lavender, T. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (07) :779-789
[40]  
Smith D. M., 2009, BRIT J MIDWIFERY, V17, P622