Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

被引:1429
作者
Cooke, Alison [1 ]
Smith, Debbie [2 ]
Booth, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Manchester NHS Fdn Trust, St Marys Hosp, Maternal & Fetal Hlth Res Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
literature; metasynthesis; research; mixed methods; qualitative; systematic reviews; OPTIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; METASYNTHESIS; RELEVANT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/1049732312452938
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Standardized systematic search strategies facilitate rigor in research. Current search tools focus on retrieval of quantitative research. In this article we address issues relating to using existing search strategy tools, most typically the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) formulation for defining key elements of a review question, when searching for qualitative and mixed methods research studies. An alternative search strategy tool for qualitative/mixed methods research is outlined: SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type). We used both the SPIDER and PICO search strategy tools with a qualitative research question. We have used the SPIDER tool to advance thinking beyond PICO in its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research. However, we have highlighted once more the need for improved indexing of qualitative articles in databases. To constitute a viable alternative to PICO, SPIDER needs to be refined and tested on a wider range of topics.
引用
收藏
页码:1435 / 1443
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Bailey N., 2004, BRIT J MIDWIFERY, V12, P680
[2]   The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option [J].
Barbour, RS .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (07) :1019-1027
[3]   Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review [J].
Barnett-Page, Elaine ;
Thomas, James .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
[4]   The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies [J].
Barroso, J ;
Gollop, CJ ;
Sandelowski, M ;
Meynell, J ;
Pearce, PF ;
Collins, LJ .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 25 (02) :153-178
[5]   THE DESIGN OF BROWSING AND BERRYPICKING TECHNIQUES FOR THE ONLINE SEARCH INTERFACE [J].
BATES, MJ .
ONLINE REVIEW, 1989, 13 (05) :407-424
[6]  
Booth A, 2000, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V88, P239
[7]  
Booth A., 2011, Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1: Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group
[8]   Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice [J].
Booth, Andrew .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2006, 24 (03) :355-368
[9]  
Booth Andrew., 2001, QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE
[10]   Perceptions of Social Support from Pregnant and Parenting Teens Using Community-Based Doulas [J].
Breedlove, Ginger .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2005, 14 (03) :15-22